CLOU vs. AIS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CLOU (Global X Cloud Computing ETF) and AIS (VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. CLOU is passively managed, while AIS is actively managed. Over the past year, CLOU returned 6.33% vs 226.72% for AIS. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLOU charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AIS.

Performance

CLOU vs. AIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOU achieves a 9.15% return, which is significantly lower than AIS's 118.61% return.

CLOU

• 1D: -3.71%
• 1M: 14.89%
• YTD: 9.15%
• 6M: 6.98%
• 1Y: 6.33%
• 3Y*: 9.18%
• 5Y*: -0.66%
• 10Y*: —

AIS

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 35.87%
• YTD: 118.61%
• 6M: 122.65%
• 1Y: 226.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOU vs. AIS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF	9.15%	-5.59%	-3.23%
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	118.61%	58.35%	-4.92%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOU and AIS is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024	0.49

The correlation between CLOU and AIS shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CLOU vs. AIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CLOU	AIS
Technology	85.3%	84.6%
Real Estate	5.6%	-
Communication Services	5.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	3.0%	-
Healthcare	0.6%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-0.0%
Industrials	-	8.9%
Utilities	-	3.2%

Return for Risk

CLOU vs. AIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOU

CLOU Risk / Return Rank: 12
CLOU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
CLOU Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
CLOU Omega Ratio Rank: 12
CLOU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
CLOU Martin Ratio Rank: 11

AIS

AIS Risk / Return Rank: 97
AIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
AIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
AIS Omega Ratio Rank: 96
AIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AIS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOU vs. AIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLOU	AIS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.22	6.34	-6.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.51	5.78	-5.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.80	-0.74
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.23	14.41	-14.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.58	47.43	-46.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CLOU vs. AIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOU Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the AIS Sharpe Ratio of 6.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOU and AIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLOU	AIS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22	6.34	-6.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.02	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	3.24	-3.00

Drawdowns

CLOU vs. AIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOU drawdown since its inception was -53.74%, which is greater than AIS's maximum drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOU and AIS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLOU	AIS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.74%	-32.78%	-20.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.24%	-15.84%	-11.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.83%	0.00%	-21.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.42%	-5.45%	-18.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.02%	4.80%	+6.22%

Volatility

CLOU vs. AIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) is 13.85%, while VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) has a volatility of 16.12%. This indicates that CLOU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLOU	AIS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.85%	16.12%	-2.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.82%	29.95%	-5.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.50%	36.00%	-6.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.57%	38.04%	-7.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.79%	38.04%	-7.25%

CLOU vs. AIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOU has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than AIS's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLOU vs. AIS - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLOU nor AIS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.76%	0.00%	0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLOU and AIS in my portfolio?

CLOU and AIS have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CLOU or AIS?

AIS has higher volatility (16.12%) compared to CLOU (13.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOU dropped -53.74% vs AIS's -32.78%.

Which ETF is better, CLOU or AIS?

On 1-year performance, AIS leads with 226.72% vs 6.33% for CLOU. On fees, CLOU is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, CLOU has been the lower-risk option at 13.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CLOU or AIS?

Over the 1-year period, AIS has performed better with a 226.72% return vs 6.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLOU or AIS?

CLOU is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLOU or AIS?

CLOU and AIS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CLOU and AIS?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for CLOU and 0.75% for AIS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.34 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.