CLOI vs. AAAC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CLOI (VanEck CLO ETF) and AAAC (Columbia AAA CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLOI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for AAAC.

Performance

CLOI vs. AAAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI) and Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with CLOI at 2.06% and AAAC at 2.06%.

CLOI

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.61%
• YTD: 2.06%
• 6M: 2.58%
• 1Y: 5.56%
• 3Y*: 7.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AAAC

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 2.06%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOI vs. AAAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CLOI VanEck CLO ETF	2.06%	0.34%
AAAC Columbia AAA CLO ETF	2.06%	0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOI and AAAC is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025	0.25

Return for Risk

CLOI vs. AAAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOI

CLOI Risk / Return Rank: 97
CLOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CLOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
CLOI Omega Ratio Rank: 98
CLOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CLOI Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOI vs. AAAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI) and Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLOI	AAAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.72	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	7.43	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.16	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.95	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	42.16	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLOI	AAAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.72	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.77	5.56	-2.80

Drawdowns

CLOI vs. AAAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOI drawdown since its inception was -3.25%, which is greater than AAAC's maximum drawdown of -0.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOI and AAAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLOI	AAAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.25%	-0.55%	-2.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.19%	-0.04%	-0.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.13%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CLOI	AAAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.14%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.67%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.19%	0.89%	+0.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.56%	0.89%	+1.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.56%	0.89%	+1.67%

CLOI vs. AAAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAC's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLOI vs. AAAC - Dividend Comparison

CLOI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%, more than AAAC's 2.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AAAC Columbia AAA CLO ETF	2.27%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CLOI VanEck CLO ETF	5.35%	5.61%	6.71%	5.61%	2.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLOI and AAAC in my portfolio?

CLOI and AAAC have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CLOI or AAAC?

On fees, AAAC is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLOI or AAAC?

AAAC is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CLOI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLOI or AAAC?

CLOI has the higher dividend yield at 5.35%, compared with 2.27% for AAAC.

What is the main difference between CLOI and AAAC?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Columbia Threadneedle. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CLOI and 0.20% for AAAC.