CLOD vs. TDV
CLOD (Themes Cloud Computing ETF) and TDV (ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - CLOD tracks the Solactive Cloud Technology Index while TDV tracks the Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CLOD returned -4.85% vs 19.75% for TDV. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CLOD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for TDV.
Performance
CLOD vs. TDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLOD achieves a -2.97% return, which is significantly lower than TDV's 15.52% return.
CLOD
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- 6M
- -3.86%
- YTD
- -2.97%
- 1Y
- -4.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDV
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- -3.45%
- 6M
- 10.89%
- YTD
- 15.52%
- 1Y
- 19.75%
- 3Y*
- 15.65%
- 5Y*
- 12.16%
- 10Y*
- —
CLOD vs. TDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOD Themes Cloud Computing ETF | -2.97% | 7.53% | 21.03% | 0.77% |
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 15.52% | 16.05% | 9.72% | 0.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLOD and TDV is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023 | 0.62 |
The correlation between CLOD and TDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CLOD vs. TDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CLOD
TDV
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
CLOD
TDV
Communication Services
CLOD
TDV
-
Consumer Cyclical
CLOD
TDV
-
Industrials
CLOD
TDV
Financial Services
CLOD
TDV
Basic Materials
CLOD
-
TDV
-
Consumer Defensive
CLOD
-
TDV
-
Energy
CLOD
-
TDV
-
Healthcare
CLOD
-
TDV
-
Real Estate
CLOD
-
TDV
-
Utilities
CLOD
-
TDV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLOD vs. TDV — Risk / Return Rank
CLOD
TDV
CLOD vs. TDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD) and ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLOD | TDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.19 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | 2.08 | -2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.32 | 6.39 | -6.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLOD vs. TDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLOD drawdown since its inception was -31.36%, roughly equal to the maximum TDV drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOD and TDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLOD | TDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.36% | -32.78% | +1.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.36% | -9.55% | -21.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.43% | -6.54% | -5.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.74% | -5.35% | -2.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.97% | 3.10% | +11.87% |
Volatility
CLOD vs. TDV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD) is 6.97%, while ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) has a volatility of 8.36%. This indicates that CLOD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLOD | TDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.97% | 8.36% | -1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.69% | 15.43% | +7.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.00% | 19.22% | +6.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.54% | 20.84% | +3.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.54% | 23.32% | +1.22% |
CLOD vs. TDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLOD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TDV's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLOD vs. TDV - Dividend Comparison
CLOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than TDV's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOD Themes Cloud Computing ETF | 1.51% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 1.05% | 1.09% | 1.16% | 1.16% | 1.67% | 1.08% | 1.10% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLOD and TDV have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TDV has higher volatility (8.36%) compared to CLOD (6.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOD dropped -31.36% vs TDV's -32.78%.
On 1-year performance, TDV leads with 19.75% vs -4.85% for CLOD. On fees, CLOD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CLOD has been the lower-risk option at 6.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TDV has performed better with a 19.75% return vs -4.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CLOD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for TDV.
CLOD has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 1.05% for TDV.
CLOD tracks Solactive Cloud Technology Index, while TDV tracks Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index. They also come from different issuers: Themes and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CLOD and 0.66% for TDV.
TDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLOD and TDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer