CLOD vs. STHH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CLOD (Themes Cloud Computing ETF) and STHH (STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged) are both Technology Equities funds - CLOD tracks the Solactive Cloud Technology Index while STHH tracks the STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CLOD returned -8.67% vs 158.32% for STHH. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLOD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for STHH.

Performance

CLOD vs. STHH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD) and STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOD achieves a -8.39% return, which is significantly lower than STHH's 187.72% return.

CLOD

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -5.33%
• YTD: -8.39%
• 6M: -9.76%
• 1Y: -8.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

STHH

• 1D: -8.12%
• 1M: 10.72%
• YTD: 187.72%
• 6M: 187.07%
• 1Y: 158.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOD vs. STHH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CLOD Themes Cloud Computing ETF	-8.39%	20.16%
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	187.72%	17.60%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOD and STHH is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025	0.34

Return for Risk

CLOD vs. STHH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOD

CLOD Risk / Return Rank: 6
CLOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
CLOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
CLOD Omega Ratio Rank: 6
CLOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
CLOD Martin Ratio Rank: 6

STHH

STHH Risk / Return Rank: 81
STHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
STHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
STHH Omega Ratio Rank: 84
STHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
STHH Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOD vs. STHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD) and STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CLOD	STHH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.34	3.02	-3.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.30	3.33	-3.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.47	-0.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.28	4.70	-4.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.59	10.65	-11.24

CLOD vs. STHH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOD Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the STHH Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOD and STHH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CLOD vs. STHH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOD drawdown since its inception was -31.36%, smaller than the maximum STHH drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOD and STHH.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLOD	STHH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.36%	-33.89%	+2.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.36%	-33.89%	+2.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.33%	-8.12%	-9.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.62%	-10.17%	+2.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.63%	14.93%	-0.30%

Volatility

CLOD vs. STHH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD) is 11.59%, while STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) has a volatility of 25.53%. This indicates that CLOD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STHH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLOD	STHH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.59%	25.53%	-13.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.32%	41.13%	-18.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.74%	52.67%	-26.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.54%	51.51%	-26.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.54%	51.51%	-26.97%

CLOD vs. STHH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than STHH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLOD vs. STHH - Dividend Comparison

CLOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, more than STHH's 0.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CLOD Themes Cloud Computing ETF	1.60%	1.47%
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	0.70%	0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLOD and STHH in my portfolio?

CLOD and STHH have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CLOD or STHH?

STHH has higher volatility (25.53%) compared to CLOD (11.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOD dropped -31.36% vs STHH's -33.89%.

Which ETF is better, CLOD or STHH?

On 1-year performance, STHH leads with 158.32% vs -8.67% for CLOD. On fees, STHH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, CLOD has been the lower-risk option at 11.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CLOD or STHH?

Over the 1-year period, STHH has performed better with a 158.32% return vs -8.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLOD or STHH?

STHH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CLOD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLOD or STHH?

CLOD has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.70% for STHH.

What is the main difference between CLOD and STHH?

CLOD tracks Solactive Cloud Technology Index, while STHH tracks STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return. They also come from different issuers: Themes and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CLOD and 0.19% for STHH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

STHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.