CLOD vs. BPH

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

CLOD (Themes Cloud Computing ETF) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLOD is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Cloud Technology Index, while BPH is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Precidian. CLOD is passively managed, while BPH is actively managed. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLOD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.

Performance

CLOD vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CLOD

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: -2.82%
• YTD: -6.67%
• 6M: -7.51%
• 1Y: -7.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BPH

• 1D: -1.91%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOD vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CLOD Themes Cloud Computing ETF	-3.55%
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	-6.27%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOD and BPH is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	0.17

CLOD vs. BPH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CLOD	BPH
Technology	82.2%	-
Communication Services	8.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	6.7%	-
Industrials	1.3%	-
Financial Services	0.7%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	100.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CLOD vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOD

CLOD Risk / Return Rank: 6
CLOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
CLOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
CLOD Omega Ratio Rank: 6
CLOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
CLOD Martin Ratio Rank: 7

BPH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOD vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CLOD	BPH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.28	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.22	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.23	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.49	—	—

Drawdowns

CLOD vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOD drawdown since its inception was -31.36%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -9.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOD and BPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLOD	BPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.36%	-9.43%	-21.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.36%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.77%	-9.43%	-6.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.59%	-2.59%	-5.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.55%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CLOD	BPH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.50%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.32%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.70%	24.65%	+1.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.54%	24.65%	-0.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.54%	24.65%	-0.11%

CLOD vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLOD vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

CLOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than BPH's 0.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	0.54%	0.00%
CLOD Themes Cloud Computing ETF	1.57%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLOD and BPH in my portfolio?

CLOD and BPH have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CLOD or BPH?

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLOD or BPH?

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CLOD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLOD or BPH?

CLOD has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 0.54% for BPH.

What is the main difference between CLOD and BPH?

CLOD is categorized as Technology Equities, while BPH is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Themes and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CLOD and 0.19% for BPH.