CLOB vs. CLOO
CLOB (VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF) and CLOO (NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLOB charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CLOO.
Performance
CLOB vs. CLOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLOB
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- 2.29%
- 1Y
- 5.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLOO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLOB vs. CLOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CLOB VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF | 0.75% |
CLOO NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF | 1.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLOB and CLOO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLOB vs. CLOO — Risk / Return Rank
CLOB
CLOO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CLOB vs. CLOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF (CLOB) and NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF (CLOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLOB | CLOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.63 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLOB vs. CLOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLOB drawdown since its inception was -5.54%, which is greater than CLOO's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOB and CLOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLOB | CLOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.54% | -0.04% | -5.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | 0.00% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.29% | -0.00% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.45% | — | — |
Volatility
CLOB vs. CLOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLOB | CLOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.41% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.43% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.89% | 0.48% | +2.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.37% | 0.48% | +4.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.37% | 0.48% | +4.89% |
CLOB vs. CLOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLOB has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOO's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLOB vs. CLOO - Dividend Comparison
CLOB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.32%, more than CLOO's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CLOB VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF | 6.32% | 6.61% | 1.65% |
CLOO NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLOB and CLOO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CLOO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CLOO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CLOB.
CLOB has the higher dividend yield at 6.32%, compared with 0.59% for CLOO.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and New York Life Investment Management. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CLOB and 0.25% for CLOO.
Find the right allocation for CLOB and CLOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer