CLOO vs. YCLO
CLOO (NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF) and YCLO (Franklin BSP CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CLOO vs. YCLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLOO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YCLO
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLOO vs. YCLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CLOO NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF | 0.48% |
YCLO Franklin BSP CLO ETF | 0.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLOO and YCLO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2026 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLOO vs. YCLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF (CLOO) and Franklin BSP CLO ETF (YCLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLOO vs. YCLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLOO drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, roughly equal to the maximum YCLO drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOO and YCLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLOO | YCLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.04% | -0.04% | 0.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -0.00% | 0.00% |
Volatility
CLOO vs. YCLO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLOO | YCLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50% | 0.44% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.50% | 0.44% | +0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.50% | 0.44% | +0.06% |
Dividends
CLOO vs. YCLO - Dividend Comparison
CLOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, more than YCLO's 0.31% yield.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
CLOO NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF | 0.59% |
YCLO Franklin BSP CLO ETF | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLOO and YCLO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLOO has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.31% for YCLO.
They also come from different issuers: New York Life Investment Management and Franklin Templeton.
Find the right allocation for CLOO and YCLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer