PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLOO vs. NISM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLOO vs. NISM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF (CLOO) and NYLI International Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (NISM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CLOO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.44%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NISM

1D
-1.87%
1M
1.42%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOO vs. NISM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CLOO and NISM is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2026

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF

Return for Risk

CLOO vs. NISM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF (CLOO) and NYLI International Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (NISM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CLOO vs. NISM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLOO vs. NISM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOO drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, smaller than the maximum NISM drawdown of -4.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOO and NISM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLOONISMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.04%

-4.35%

+4.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.00%

+2.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-1.68%

+1.68%

Volatility

CLOO vs. NISM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLOONISMDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50%

14.55%

-14.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.50%

14.55%

-14.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.50%

14.55%

-14.05%

CLOO vs. NISM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than NISM's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLOO vs. NISM - Dividend Comparison

CLOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, more than NISM's 0.24% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CLOO and NISM have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CLOO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CLOO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for NISM.

CLOO has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.24% for NISM.

CLOO is categorized as CLO, while NISM is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CLOO and 0.70% for NISM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLOO and NISM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer