PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLOB vs. BIZD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CLOB vs. BIZD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF (CLOB) and VanEck Vectors BDC Income ETF (BIZD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CLOB vs. BIZD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CLOB
VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF
-0.27%6.94%2.81%
BIZD
VanEck Vectors BDC Income ETF
-11.26%-4.96%7.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOB achieves a -0.27% return, which is significantly higher than BIZD's -11.26% return.


CLOB

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.52%
YTD
-0.27%
6M
1.20%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BIZD

1D
-1.69%
1M
-2.45%
YTD
-11.26%
6M
-9.63%
1Y
-17.22%
3Y*
5.73%
5Y*
5.22%
10Y*
7.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CLOB vs. BIZD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOB has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than BIZD's 10.92% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CLOB vs. BIZD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOB
CLOB Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
CLOB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOB Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOB Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

BIZD
BIZD Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BIZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIZD Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BIZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIZD Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOB vs. BIZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF (CLOB) and VanEck Vectors BDC Income ETF (BIZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLOBBIZDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.75

-0.81

+1.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.94

-1.05

+1.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.87

+0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

-0.73

+1.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.90

-1.49

+8.39

CLOB vs. BIZD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOB Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is higher than the BIZD Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOB and BIZD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLOBBIZDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

-0.81

+1.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.30

+0.80

Correlation

The correlation between CLOB and BIZD is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CLOB vs. BIZD - Dividend Comparison

CLOB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.65%, less than BIZD's 14.23% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLOB
VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF
6.65%6.61%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BIZD
VanEck Vectors BDC Income ETF
14.23%11.78%10.94%10.96%11.21%8.14%10.39%9.13%10.88%9.13%8.51%9.12%

Drawdowns

CLOB vs. BIZD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOB drawdown since its inception was -5.54%, smaller than the maximum BIZD drawdown of -55.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOB and BIZD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CLOBBIZDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.54%

-55.44%

+49.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.25%

-22.22%

+16.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-21.29%

+20.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.29%

-6.58%

+6.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.80%

10.98%

-10.18%

Volatility

CLOB vs. BIZD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF (CLOB) is 1.42%, while VanEck Vectors BDC Income ETF (BIZD) has a volatility of 6.68%. This indicates that CLOB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CLOBBIZDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

6.68%

-5.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.48%

14.30%

-11.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.01%

21.28%

-14.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.76%

17.17%

-11.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.76%

21.59%

-15.83%