CLOA vs. AAAC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CLOA (BlackRock AAA CLO ETF) and AAAC (Columbia AAA CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.

Performance

CLOA vs. AAAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA) and Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with CLOA at 2.06% and AAAC at 2.06%.

CLOA

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 2.06%
• 6M: 2.51%
• 1Y: 5.28%
• 3Y*: 6.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AAAC

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 2.06%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOA vs. AAAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CLOA BlackRock AAA CLO ETF	2.06%	0.40%
AAAC Columbia AAA CLO ETF	2.06%	0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOA and AAAC is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025	0.18

Return for Risk

CLOA vs. AAAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOA

CLOA Risk / Return Rank: 99
CLOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CLOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CLOA Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CLOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CLOA Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOA vs. AAAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA) and Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLOA	AAAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	7.45	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	13.98	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.34	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	30.02	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	150.47	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLOA	AAAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.45	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	5.22	5.56	-0.35

Drawdowns

CLOA vs. AAAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOA drawdown since its inception was -1.34%, which is greater than AAAC's maximum drawdown of -0.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOA and AAAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLOA	AAAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.34%	-0.55%	-0.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.05%	-0.04%	-0.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.04%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CLOA	AAAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.15%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.48%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71%	0.89%	-0.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.32%	0.89%	+0.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.32%	0.89%	+0.43%

CLOA vs. AAAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CLOA and AAAC have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CLOA vs. AAAC - Dividend Comparison

CLOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, more than AAAC's 2.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AAAC Columbia AAA CLO ETF	2.27%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%
CLOA BlackRock AAA CLO ETF	4.96%	5.35%	6.01%	5.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLOA and AAAC in my portfolio?

CLOA and AAAC have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CLOA or AAAC?

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLOA or AAAC?

CLOA and AAAC have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLOA or AAAC?

CLOA has the higher dividend yield at 4.96%, compared with 2.27% for AAAC.

What is the main difference between CLOA and AAAC?

They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Columbia Threadneedle.