PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLNK vs. BSOL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLNK vs. BSOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Chainlink ETF (CLNK) and Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CLNK

1D
-4.18%
1M
-12.86%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BSOL

1D
-4.71%
1M
-14.67%
YTD
-40.79%
6M
-47.91%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLNK vs. BSOL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)
CLNK
Bitwise Chainlink ETF
-41.92%
BSOL
Bitwise Solana Staking ETF
-50.28%

Correlation

The correlation between CLNK and BSOL is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2026

0.94

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLNK vs. BSOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Chainlink ETF (CLNK) and Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CLNK vs. BSOL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLNKBSOLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.14

-1.07

-0.06

Drawdowns

CLNK vs. BSOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLNK drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, smaller than the maximum BSOL drawdown of -62.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLNK and BSOL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLNKBSOLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.56%

-62.00%

+18.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.92%

-62.00%

+20.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.34%

-43.66%

+11.32%

Volatility

CLNK vs. BSOL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLNKBSOLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.16%

75.26%

-8.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.16%

75.26%

-8.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.16%

75.26%

-8.10%

CLNK vs. BSOL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLNK has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than BSOL's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLNK vs. BSOL - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLNK nor BSOL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, CLNK and BSOL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BSOL is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BSOL is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for CLNK.

CLNK and BSOL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

CLNK tracks Chainlink (LINK) spot price, while BSOL tracks Solana (SOL) spot price. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for CLNK and 0.20% for BSOL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLNK and BSOL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer