CLNK vs. BSOL
CLNK (Bitwise Chainlink ETF) and BSOL (Bitwise Solana Staking ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Bitwise - CLNK tracks the Chainlink (LINK) spot price while BSOL tracks the Solana (SOL) spot price. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CLNK charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for BSOL.
Performance
CLNK vs. BSOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLNK
- 1D
- -4.18%
- 1M
- -12.86%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSOL
- 1D
- -4.71%
- 1M
- -14.67%
- YTD
- -40.79%
- 6M
- -47.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLNK vs. BSOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CLNK Bitwise Chainlink ETF | -41.92% |
BSOL Bitwise Solana Staking ETF | -50.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLNK and BSOL is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2026 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLNK vs. BSOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Chainlink ETF (CLNK) and Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLNK | BSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.14 | -1.07 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
CLNK vs. BSOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLNK drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, smaller than the maximum BSOL drawdown of -62.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLNK and BSOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLNK | BSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.56% | -62.00% | +18.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.92% | -62.00% | +20.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.34% | -43.66% | +11.32% |
Volatility
CLNK vs. BSOL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLNK | BSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.16% | 75.26% | -8.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.16% | 75.26% | -8.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.16% | 75.26% | -8.10% |
CLNK vs. BSOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLNK has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than BSOL's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLNK vs. BSOL - Dividend Comparison
Neither CLNK nor BSOL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, CLNK and BSOL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BSOL is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSOL is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for CLNK.
CLNK and BSOL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
CLNK tracks Chainlink (LINK) spot price, while BSOL tracks Solana (SOL) spot price. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for CLNK and 0.20% for BSOL.
Find the right allocation for CLNK and BSOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer