BSOL vs. ZCSH
BSOL (Bitwise Solana Staking ETF) and ZCSH (Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)) are both Cryptocurrency funds - BSOL tracks the Solana (SOL) spot price while ZCSH tracks the Zcash (ZEC). Both are passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSOL charges 0.20%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for ZCSH.
Performance
BSOL vs. ZCSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSOL achieves a -43.17% return, which is significantly lower than ZCSH's -12.85% return.
BSOL
- 1D
- -5.48%
- 1M
- -18.32%
- YTD
- -43.17%
- 6M
- -43.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZCSH
- 1D
- -6.64%
- 1M
- -41.90%
- YTD
- -12.85%
- 6M
- -2.07%
- 1Y
- 725.30%
- 3Y*
- 137.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSOL vs. ZCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BSOL Bitwise Solana Staking ETF | -43.17% | -38.11% |
ZCSH Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) | -12.85% | 10.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSOL and ZCSH is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSOL vs. ZCSH — Risk / Return Rank
BSOL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ZCSH
BSOL vs. ZCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL) and Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSOL | ZCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.43 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 10.52 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 19.90 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSOL vs. ZCSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSOL drawdown since its inception was -67.62%, smaller than the maximum ZCSH drawdown of -93.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSOL and ZCSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSOL | ZCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.62% | -93.73% | +26.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -69.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -71.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.83% | -48.02% | -16.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.95% | -74.01% | +27.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 36.72% | — |
Volatility
BSOL vs. ZCSH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSOL | ZCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 64.75% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 107.29% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.29% | 174.37% | -98.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 76.29% | 138.34% | -62.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 76.29% | 138.34% | -62.05% |
BSOL vs. ZCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSOL has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ZCSH's 2.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSOL vs. ZCSH - Dividend Comparison
Neither BSOL nor ZCSH has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BSOL and ZCSH have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSOL is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSOL is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ZCSH.
BSOL and ZCSH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BSOL tracks Solana (SOL) spot price, while ZCSH tracks Zcash (ZEC). They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for BSOL and 2.50% for ZCSH.
Find the right allocation for BSOL and ZCSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer