PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLNK vs. BFOC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLNK vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Chainlink ETF (CLNK) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CLNK

1D
-4.18%
1M
-12.86%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BFOC

1D
-0.24%
1M
-2.82%
YTD
-7.39%
6M
-9.28%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLNK vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CLNK and BFOC is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2026

0.77

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLNK vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Chainlink ETF (CLNK) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CLNK vs. BFOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLNKBFOCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.14

-1.88

+0.74

Drawdowns

CLNK vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLNK drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, which is greater than BFOC's maximum drawdown of -18.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLNK and BFOC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLNKBFOCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.56%

-18.20%

-25.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.92%

-18.20%

-23.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.34%

-12.52%

-19.82%

Volatility

CLNK vs. BFOC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLNKBFOCDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.16%

12.61%

+54.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.16%

12.61%

+54.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.16%

12.61%

+54.55%

CLNK vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLNK has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than BFOC's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLNK vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLNK nor BFOC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CLNK and BFOC have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CLNK is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CLNK is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFOC.

CLNK and BFOC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

CLNK is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for CLNK and 0.90% for BFOC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLNK and BFOC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer