CLIX vs. ONLN
CLIX (ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF) and ONLN (ProShares Online Retail ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLIX is a Long-Short fund tracking the ProShares Long Online/Short Stores Index, while ONLN is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the ProShares Online Retail Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CLIX returned -6.40%/yr vs -6.10%/yr for ONLN. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CLIX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for ONLN.
Performance
CLIX vs. ONLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CLIX having a -6.21% return and ONLN slightly lower at -6.45%.
CLIX
- 1D
- -2.35%
- 1M
- -6.73%
- YTD
- -6.21%
- 6M
- -6.37%
- 1Y
- 12.94%
- 3Y*
- 18.92%
- 5Y*
- -6.40%
- 10Y*
- —
ONLN
- 1D
- -2.12%
- 1M
- -7.61%
- YTD
- -6.45%
- 6M
- -7.82%
- 1Y
- 12.40%
- 3Y*
- 21.88%
- 5Y*
- -6.10%
- 10Y*
- —
CLIX vs. ONLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLIX ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF | -6.21% | 32.81% | 20.73% | 28.97% | -46.73% | -39.96% | 90.91% | 17.32% | -18.55% |
ONLN ProShares Online Retail ETF | -6.45% | 33.03% | 24.85% | 27.37% | -50.07% | -25.22% | 111.82% | 19.93% | -24.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLIX and ONLN is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2018 | 0.91 |
The correlation between CLIX and ONLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
CLIX vs. ONLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CLIX
ONLN
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
CLIX
ONLN
Technology
CLIX
ONLN
Consumer Defensive
CLIX
ONLN
Basic Materials
CLIX
-
ONLN
-
Communication Services
CLIX
-
ONLN
-
Energy
CLIX
-
ONLN
-
Financial Services
CLIX
-
ONLN
-
Healthcare
CLIX
-
ONLN
-
Industrials
CLIX
-
ONLN
-
Real Estate
CLIX
-
ONLN
-
Utilities
CLIX
-
ONLN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLIX vs. ONLN — Risk / Return Rank
CLIX
ONLN
CLIX vs. ONLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) and ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLIX | ONLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.10 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | 0.63 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.81 | 1.61 | +0.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLIX | ONLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 0.53 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.24 | -0.19 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.14 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
CLIX vs. ONLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLIX drawdown since its inception was -73.21%, roughly equal to the maximum ONLN drawdown of -71.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLIX and ONLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLIX | ONLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.21% | -71.77% | -1.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.57% | -19.75% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.18% | -27.97% | +6.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.22% | -69.19% | +0.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.59% | -39.42% | -5.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.70% | -35.43% | +0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.15% | 7.73% | -0.58% |
Volatility
CLIX vs. ONLN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) is 5.08%, while ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN) has a volatility of 6.23%. This indicates that CLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLIX | ONLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 6.23% | -1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.59% | 17.29% | -1.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.89% | 23.75% | -2.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.94% | 33.04% | -6.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.92% | 32.10% | -6.18% |
CLIX vs. ONLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLIX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ONLN's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLIX vs. ONLN - Dividend Comparison
CLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, more than ONLN's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLIX ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF | 0.57% | 0.46% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.33% |
ONLN ProShares Online Retail ETF | 0.35% | 0.30% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, CLIX and ONLN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ONLN has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to CLIX (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLIX dropped -73.21% vs ONLN's -71.77%.
On 5-year performance, ONLN leads with -6.10% vs -6.40% for CLIX. On fees, ONLN is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, CLIX has been the lower-risk option at 5.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ONLN has performed better with a -6.10% return vs -6.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ONLN is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CLIX.
CLIX has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.35% for ONLN.
CLIX is categorized as Long-Short, while ONLN is Consumer Discretionary Equities. CLIX tracks ProShares Long Online/Short Stores Index, while ONLN tracks ProShares Online Retail Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CLIX and 0.58% for ONLN.
CLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLIX and ONLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer