PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLIX vs. ONLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLIX vs. ONLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) and ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CLIX having a -6.21% return and ONLN slightly lower at -6.45%.


CLIX

1D
-2.35%
1M
-6.73%
YTD
-6.21%
6M
-6.37%
1Y
12.94%
3Y*
18.92%
5Y*
-6.40%
10Y*

ONLN

1D
-2.12%
1M
-7.61%
YTD
-6.45%
6M
-7.82%
1Y
12.40%
3Y*
21.88%
5Y*
-6.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLIX vs. ONLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CLIX
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF
-6.21%32.81%20.73%28.97%-46.73%-39.96%90.91%17.32%-18.55%
ONLN
ProShares Online Retail ETF
-6.45%33.03%24.85%27.37%-50.07%-25.22%111.82%19.93%-24.73%

Correlation

The correlation between CLIX and ONLN is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2018

0.91

The correlation between CLIX and ONLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

CLIX vs. ONLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CLIX
ONLN

Consumer Cyclical

94.8%
94.8%

Technology

3.6%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

1.6%
1.6%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

CLIX
94.8%
ONLN
94.8%

Technology

CLIX
3.6%
ONLN
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

CLIX
1.6%
ONLN
1.6%

Basic Materials

CLIX

-

ONLN

-

Communication Services

CLIX

-

ONLN

-

Energy

CLIX

-

ONLN

-

Financial Services

CLIX

-

ONLN

-

Healthcare

CLIX

-

ONLN

-

Industrials

CLIX

-

ONLN

-

Real Estate

CLIX

-

ONLN

-

Utilities

CLIX

-

ONLN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLIX vs. ONLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLIX
CLIX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
CLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
CLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

ONLN
ONLN Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
ONLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONLN Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
ONLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONLN Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLIX vs. ONLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) and ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLIXONLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.10

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

0.63

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.81

1.61

+0.20

CLIX vs. ONLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is comparable to the ONLN Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLIX and ONLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLIXONLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

0.53

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

-0.19

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.14

+0.03

Drawdowns

CLIX vs. ONLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLIX drawdown since its inception was -73.21%, roughly equal to the maximum ONLN drawdown of -71.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLIX and ONLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLIXONLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.21%

-71.77%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.57%

-19.75%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.18%

-27.97%

+6.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.22%

-69.19%

+0.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.59%

-39.42%

-5.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.70%

-35.43%

+0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.15%

7.73%

-0.58%

Volatility

CLIX vs. ONLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) is 5.08%, while ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN) has a volatility of 6.23%. This indicates that CLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLIXONLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.08%

6.23%

-1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.59%

17.29%

-1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.89%

23.75%

-2.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.94%

33.04%

-6.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.92%

32.10%

-6.18%

CLIX vs. ONLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLIX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ONLN's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLIX vs. ONLN - Dividend Comparison

CLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, more than ONLN's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
CLIX
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF
0.57%0.46%0.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.33%
ONLN
ProShares Online Retail ETF
0.35%0.30%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, CLIX and ONLN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ONLN has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to CLIX (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLIX dropped -73.21% vs ONLN's -71.77%.

On 5-year performance, ONLN leads with -6.10% vs -6.40% for CLIX. On fees, ONLN is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, CLIX has been the lower-risk option at 5.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ONLN has performed better with a -6.10% return vs -6.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ONLN is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CLIX.

CLIX has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.35% for ONLN.

CLIX is categorized as Long-Short, while ONLN is Consumer Discretionary Equities. CLIX tracks ProShares Long Online/Short Stores Index, while ONLN tracks ProShares Online Retail Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CLIX and 0.58% for ONLN.

CLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLIX and ONLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer