CLIX vs. IDUB
CLIX (ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF) and IDUB (Aptus International Enhanced Yield ETF) are both Long-Short funds. CLIX is passively managed, while IDUB is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CLIX returned 18.92%/yr vs 18.02%/yr for IDUB. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CLIX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for IDUB.
Performance
CLIX vs. IDUB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLIX achieves a -6.21% return, which is significantly lower than IDUB's 16.05% return.
CLIX
- 1D
- -2.35%
- 1M
- -6.73%
- YTD
- -6.21%
- 6M
- -6.37%
- 1Y
- 12.94%
- 3Y*
- 18.92%
- 5Y*
- -6.40%
- 10Y*
- —
IDUB
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 16.05%
- 6M
- 18.64%
- 1Y
- 33.98%
- 3Y*
- 18.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLIX vs. IDUB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLIX ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF | -6.21% | 32.81% | 20.73% | 28.97% | -46.73% | -31.16% |
IDUB Aptus International Enhanced Yield ETF | 16.05% | 27.53% | 6.12% | 9.07% | -19.79% | -1.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLIX and IDUB is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2021 | 0.58 |
The correlation between CLIX and IDUB shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CLIX vs. IDUB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CLIX
IDUB
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
CLIX
IDUB
Technology
CLIX
IDUB
Consumer Defensive
CLIX
IDUB
Basic Materials
CLIX
-
IDUB
Communication Services
CLIX
-
IDUB
Energy
CLIX
-
IDUB
Financial Services
CLIX
-
IDUB
Healthcare
CLIX
-
IDUB
Industrials
CLIX
-
IDUB
Real Estate
CLIX
-
IDUB
Utilities
CLIX
-
IDUB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLIX vs. IDUB — Risk / Return Rank
CLIX
IDUB
CLIX vs. IDUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) and Aptus International Enhanced Yield ETF (IDUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLIX | IDUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.40 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | 2.98 | -2.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.81 | 11.87 | -10.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLIX | IDUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 2.21 | -1.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.44 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
CLIX vs. IDUB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLIX drawdown since its inception was -73.21%, which is greater than IDUB's maximum drawdown of -29.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLIX and IDUB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLIX | IDUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.21% | -29.20% | -44.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.57% | -11.46% | -8.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.18% | -12.88% | -8.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.59% | -0.99% | -43.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.70% | -11.17% | -23.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.15% | 2.87% | +4.28% |
Volatility
CLIX vs. IDUB - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) and Aptus International Enhanced Yield ETF (IDUB) have volatilities of 5.08% and 5.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLIX | IDUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 5.23% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.59% | 12.95% | +2.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.89% | 15.48% | +5.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.94% | 14.64% | +12.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.92% | 14.64% | +11.28% |
CLIX vs. IDUB - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLIX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IDUB's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLIX vs. IDUB - Dividend Comparison
CLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than IDUB's 4.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLIX ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF | 0.57% | 0.46% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.33% |
IDUB Aptus International Enhanced Yield ETF | 4.98% | 4.90% | 5.64% | 3.71% | 2.62% | 1.38% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLIX and IDUB have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDUB has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to CLIX (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLIX dropped -73.21% vs IDUB's -29.20%.
On 3-year performance, CLIX leads with 18.92% vs 18.02% for IDUB. On fees, IDUB is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, CLIX has been the lower-risk option at 5.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CLIX has performed better with a 18.92% return vs 18.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDUB is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CLIX.
IDUB has the higher dividend yield at 4.98%, compared with 0.57% for CLIX.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Aptus. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CLIX and 0.45% for IDUB.
IDUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLIX and IDUB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer