CLG.TO vs. XGRO.TO
CLG.TO (iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF) and XGRO.TO (iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio) are both exchange-traded funds - CLG.TO is a Canadian Government Bonds fund tracking the Morningstar Can Core Bd GR CAD, while XGRO.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by iShares. CLG.TO is passively managed, while XGRO.TO is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, CLG.TO returned 1.54%/yr vs 10.17%/yr for XGRO.TO. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLG.TO charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XGRO.TO.
Performance
CLG.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLG.TO achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly lower than XGRO.TO's 10.70% return. Over the past 10 years, CLG.TO has underperformed XGRO.TO with an annualized return of 1.54%, while XGRO.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.17% annualized return.
CLG.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 1.12%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 2.75%
- 3Y*
- 4.14%
- 5Y*
- 1.34%
- 10Y*
- 1.54%
XGRO.TO
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 5.00%
- YTD
- 10.70%
- 6M
- 8.71%
- 1Y
- 23.83%
- 3Y*
- 18.10%
- 5Y*
- 10.89%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
CLG.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLG.TO iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF | 1.12% | 3.35% | 4.30% | 4.82% | -6.21% | -2.23% | 6.66% | 3.40% | 1.69% | -0.02% |
XGRO.TO iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio | 10.70% | 15.59% | 19.53% | 15.01% | -11.08% | 14.29% | 11.51% | 17.97% | -6.73% | 11.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLG.TO and XGRO.TO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2011 | 0.07 |
Over the past year, CLG.TO and XGRO.TO have become more correlated (0.37) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLG.TO vs. XGRO.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CLG.TO
XGRO.TO
CLG.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLG.TO) and iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLG.TO | XGRO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.42 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 3.36 | -1.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.56 | 14.92 | -11.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLG.TO | XGRO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 2.22 | -1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.99 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.83 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.36 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
CLG.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLG.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.74%, smaller than the maximum XGRO.TO drawdown of -47.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLG.TO and XGRO.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLG.TO | XGRO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.74% | -47.97% | +37.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.93% | -7.12% | +5.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.38% | -12.47% | +9.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.96% | -18.40% | +8.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -10.74% | -25.85% | +15.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | 0.00% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.00% | -8.49% | +6.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 1.60% | -0.83% |
Volatility
CLG.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLG.TO) is 1.13%, while iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO) has a volatility of 3.40%. This indicates that CLG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XGRO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLG.TO | XGRO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.13% | 3.40% | -2.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.34% | 9.20% | -6.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.00% | 10.78% | -7.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.31% | 11.05% | -6.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.34% | 12.26% | -7.92% |
CLG.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLG.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than XGRO.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CLG.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Dividend Comparison
CLG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than XGRO.TO's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLG.TO iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF | 2.54% | 2.54% | 2.53% | 2.51% | 2.55% | 2.61% | 2.59% | 2.88% | 3.02% | 3.17% | 3.25% | 3.34% |
XGRO.TO iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio | 1.75% | 1.92% | 1.98% | 2.22% | 1.86% | 1.66% | 1.94% | 2.21% | 7.42% | 2.04% | 2.65% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLG.TO and XGRO.TO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CLG.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CLG.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XGRO.TO.
CLG.TO is categorized as Canadian Government Bonds, while XGRO.TO is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for CLG.TO and 0.20% for XGRO.TO.
Find the right allocation for CLG.TO and XGRO.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer