PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XGRO.TO vs. ZGRO.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

XGRO.TO vs. ZGRO.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO) and BMO Growth ETF (ZGRO.TO).

XGRO.TO and ZGRO.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XGRO.TO is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Jun 21, 2007. ZGRO.TO is an actively managed fund by BMO. It was launched on Feb 11, 2019.

Performance

XGRO.TO vs. ZGRO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO) and BMO Growth ETF (ZGRO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XGRO.TO vs. ZGRO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XGRO.TO
iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio		0.51%15.59%19.53%15.01%-11.08%14.29%11.51%10.37%
ZGRO.TO
BMO Growth ETF		0.36%16.39%20.71%14.64%-10.58%14.99%10.81%10.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGRO.TO achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly higher than ZGRO.TO's 0.36% return.

XGRO.TO

1D
2.22%
1M
-3.88%
YTD
0.51%
6M
1.47%
1Y
15.73%
3Y*
14.73%
5Y*
9.23%
10Y*
9.49%

ZGRO.TO

1D
1.16%
1M
-4.08%
YTD
0.36%
6M
2.70%
1Y
16.64%
3Y*
15.19%
5Y*
9.89%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio

BMO Growth ETF

Often compared with XGRO.TO:
XGRO.TO vs. XEQT.TOXGRO.TO vs. VGRO.TOXGRO.TO vs. VEQT.TOXGRO.TO vs. XCG.TOXGRO.TO vs. TGRO.TOXGRO.TO vs. XAW.TOXGRO.TO vs. VDY.TO
Often compared with ZGRO.TO:
ZGRO.TO vs. VGRO.TOZGRO.TO vs. TGRO.TOZGRO.TO vs. XEQT.TOZGRO.TO vs. VFV.TOZGRO.TO vs. ZBAL.TOZGRO.TO vs. XDIV.TOZGRO.TO vs. ZDY.TO

XGRO.TO vs. ZGRO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XGRO.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ZGRO.TO's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

XGRO.TO
iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio
ZGRO.TO
BMO Growth ETF

Return for Risk

XGRO.TO vs. ZGRO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XGRO.TO
XGRO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGRO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGRO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XGRO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGRO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
ZGRO.TO
ZGRO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ZGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZGRO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZGRO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ZGRO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZGRO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGRO.TO vs. ZGRO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO) and BMO Growth ETF (ZGRO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XGRO.TOZGRO.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.17

1.24

-0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.66

1.73

-0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.25

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

1.76

-0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.36

7.43

-0.07

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XGRO.TO vs. ZGRO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the ZGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGRO.TO and ZGRO.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XGRO.TOZGRO.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

1.24

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.94

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.82

-0.49

Correlation

The correlation between XGRO.TO and ZGRO.TO is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

XGRO.TO vs. ZGRO.TO - Dividend Comparison

XGRO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than ZGRO.TO's 1.63% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XGRO.TO
iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio		1.93%1.92%1.98%2.22%1.86%1.66%1.94%2.21%7.42%2.04%2.65%2.15%
ZGRO.TO
BMO Growth ETF		1.63%1.70%1.92%2.27%2.54%2.22%2.49%2.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XGRO.TO vs. ZGRO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGRO.TO drawdown since its inception was -47.97%, which is greater than ZGRO.TO's maximum drawdown of -24.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGRO.TO and ZGRO.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

XGRO.TOZGRO.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.97%

-24.64%

-23.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.78%

-9.83%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.40%

-17.19%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.85%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.37%

-4.35%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.56%

-3.43%

-5.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

2.32%

-0.12%

Volatility

XGRO.TO vs. ZGRO.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.06% compared to BMO Growth ETF (ZGRO.TO) at 5.60%. This indicates that XGRO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZGRO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

XGRO.TOZGRO.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.06%

5.60%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.59%

8.71%

-0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.49%

13.50%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.89%

10.62%

+0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.20%

13.00%

-0.80%