CLFD vs. UI
CLFD (Clearfield, Inc.) and UI (Ubiquiti Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Communication Equipment industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 10 years, CLFD returned 9.51%/yr vs 31.51%/yr for UI. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CLFD vs. UI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLFD achieves a 54.82% return, which is significantly higher than UI's 4.37% return. Over the past 10 years, CLFD has underperformed UI with an annualized return of 9.51%, while UI has yielded a comparatively higher 31.51% annualized return.
CLFD
- 1D
- -6.35%
- 1M
- 53.66%
- YTD
- 54.82%
- 6M
- 59.53%
- 1Y
- 17.53%
- 3Y*
- 3.53%
- 5Y*
- 1.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.51%
UI
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- -42.55%
- YTD
- 4.37%
- 6M
- 2.45%
- 1Y
- 43.63%
- 3Y*
- 51.93%
- 5Y*
- 13.52%
- 10Y*
- 31.51%
CLFD vs. UI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLFD Clearfield, Inc. | 54.82% | -5.97% | 6.60% | -69.11% | 11.51% | 241.50% | 77.33% | 40.52% | -19.02% | -40.82% |
UI Ubiquiti Inc. | 4.37% | 67.72% | 141.15% | -48.23% | -9.99% | 10.83% | 48.49% | 91.65% | 40.69% | 22.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLFD and UI is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2011 | 0.32 |
The correlation between CLFD and UI shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CLFD:
$616.95M
UI:
$34.90B
CLFD:
-$0.62
UI:
$15.56
CLFD:
4.58
UI:
11.27
CLFD:
2.54
UI:
29.03
CLFD:
$136.22M
UI:
$3.10B
CLFD:
$50.71M
UI:
$1.42B
CLFD:
$11.00M
UI:
$1.12B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLFD vs. UI — Risk / Return Rank
CLFD
UI
CLFD vs. UI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) and Ubiquiti Inc. (UI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLFD | UI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.19 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 0.94 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.64 | 2.35 | -1.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLFD | UI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 | 0.71 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 0.28 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 0.66 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.54 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
CLFD vs. UI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLFD drawdown since its inception was -98.62%, which is greater than UI's maximum drawdown of -77.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLFD and UI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLFD | UI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.62% | -77.49% | -21.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.66% | -46.87% | +4.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.04% | -46.87% | -7.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.52% | -69.44% | -13.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.52% | -72.21% | -10.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.71% | -46.81% | -18.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.00% | -26.52% | -36.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.27% | 18.61% | +8.66% |
Volatility
CLFD vs. UI - Volatility Comparison
Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) has a higher volatility of 32.67% compared to Ubiquiti Inc. (UI) at 20.18%. This indicates that CLFD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLFD | UI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.67% | 20.18% | +12.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.10% | 39.85% | +2.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.59% | 61.91% | -4.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.22% | 48.67% | +8.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.25% | 47.98% | +4.27% |
Dividends
CLFD vs. UI - Dividend Comparison
CLFD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLFD Clearfield, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UI Ubiquiti Inc. | 0.56% | 0.51% | 0.72% | 1.72% | 0.88% | 0.65% | 0.50% | 0.58% | 0.50% |
Financials
CLFD vs. UI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Clearfield, Inc. and Ubiquiti Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CLFD vs. UI - Profitability Comparison
CLFD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Clearfield, Inc. reported a gross profit of 11.16M and revenue of 34.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.5%.
UI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ubiquiti Inc. reported a gross profit of 370.71M and revenue of 788.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.0%.
CLFD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Clearfield, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.07M and revenue of 34.39M, resulting in an operating margin of -6.0%.
UI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ubiquiti Inc. reported an operating income of 290.82M and revenue of 788.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 36.9%.
CLFD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Clearfield, Inc. reported a net income of -528.00K and revenue of 34.39M, resulting in a net margin of -1.5%.
UI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ubiquiti Inc. reported a net income of 233.91M and revenue of 788.20M, resulting in a net margin of 29.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CLFD and UI have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLFD has higher volatility (32.67%) compared to UI (20.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLFD dropped -98.62% vs UI's -77.49%.
UI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLFD and UI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer