PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLEYX vs. SWLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLEYX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Cornerstone Equity Fund Institutional Class 3 (CLEYX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLEYX achieves a 2.55% return, which is significantly lower than SWLGX's 3.19% return.


CLEYX

1D
-5.14%
1M
-3.59%
YTD
2.55%
6M
1.68%
1Y
17.82%
3Y*
17.01%
5Y*
11.13%
10Y*

SWLGX

1D
-1.26%
1M
-2.48%
YTD
3.19%
6M
1.92%
1Y
19.96%
3Y*
22.61%
5Y*
13.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLEYX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLEYX
Columbia Cornerstone Equity Fund Institutional Class 3
2.55%14.27%24.38%28.50%-19.32%30.17%19.72%28.96%-5.58%-0.49%
SWLGX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
3.19%18.55%33.30%42.67%-29.17%27.55%38.43%36.30%-1.59%-0.60%

Correlation

The correlation between CLEYX and SWLGX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2017

0.94

The correlation between CLEYX and SWLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLEYX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLEYX
CLEYX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
CLEYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLEYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLEYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
CLEYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLEYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

SWLGX
SWLGX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SWLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
SWLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLEYX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Cornerstone Equity Fund Institutional Class 3 (CLEYX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CLEYXSWLGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.23

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

1.32

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.71

4.34

+3.37

CLEYX vs. SWLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLEYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the SWLGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLEYX and SWLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLEYX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLEYX drawdown since its inception was -33.40%, roughly equal to the maximum SWLGX drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLEYX and SWLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLEYXSWLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.40%

-32.69%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.52%

-16.16%

+5.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.15%

-23.30%

+2.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.26%

-32.69%

+7.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.88%

-5.34%

-0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-7.04%

+2.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

4.91%

-2.44%

Volatility

CLEYX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Cornerstone Equity Fund Institutional Class 3 (CLEYX) has a higher volatility of 7.12% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) at 5.91%. This indicates that CLEYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLEYXSWLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.12%

5.91%

+1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.48%

12.60%

-1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.79%

16.21%

-2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.43%

21.61%

-4.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.78%

22.68%

-3.90%

CLEYX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLEYX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLEYX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison

CLEYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, more than SWLGX's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLEYX
Columbia Cornerstone Equity Fund Institutional Class 3
1.30%3.19%6.53%5.08%6.51%7.70%7.37%5.36%11.41%5.75%
SWLGX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
0.44%0.46%0.52%0.67%0.93%1.76%0.67%0.96%1.03%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, CLEYX and SWLGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CLEYX has higher volatility (7.12%) compared to SWLGX (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLEYX dropped -33.40% vs SWLGX's -32.69%.

CLEYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLEYX and SWLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer