PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLEYX vs. FOCKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLEYX vs. FOCKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Cornerstone Equity Fund Institutional Class 3 (CLEYX) and Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLEYX achieves a 8.11% return, which is significantly lower than FOCKX's 29.57% return.


CLEYX

1D
1.03%
1M
1.64%
YTD
8.11%
6M
7.70%
1Y
25.41%
3Y*
18.63%
5Y*
12.70%
10Y*

FOCKX

1D
2.02%
1M
5.85%
YTD
29.57%
6M
29.94%
1Y
60.92%
3Y*
34.63%
5Y*
19.05%
10Y*
23.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLEYX vs. FOCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLEYX
Columbia Cornerstone Equity Fund Institutional Class 3
8.11%14.27%24.38%28.50%-19.32%30.17%19.72%28.96%-5.58%15.70%
FOCKX
Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K
29.57%22.28%38.91%42.92%-32.07%25.06%46.83%39.36%-3.18%25.31%

Correlation

The correlation between CLEYX and FOCKX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2017

0.90

The correlation between CLEYX and FOCKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLEYX vs. FOCKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLEYX
CLEYX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
CLEYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLEYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLEYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
CLEYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLEYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

FOCKX
FOCKX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FOCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FOCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLEYX vs. FOCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Cornerstone Equity Fund Institutional Class 3 (CLEYX) and Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CLEYXFOCKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.53

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

5.40

-3.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.28

22.89

-12.61

CLEYX vs. FOCKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLEYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is lower than the FOCKX Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLEYX and FOCKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLEYX vs. FOCKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLEYX drawdown since its inception was -33.40%, smaller than the maximum FOCKX drawdown of -53.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLEYX and FOCKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLEYXFOCKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.40%

-53.33%

+19.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.52%

-11.28%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.15%

-24.83%

+3.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.26%

-36.97%

+11.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-0.09%

-0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-8.36%

+3.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

2.65%

-0.21%

Volatility

CLEYX vs. FOCKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Cornerstone Equity Fund Institutional Class 3 (CLEYX) is 4.81%, while Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX) has a volatility of 8.83%. This indicates that CLEYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLEYXFOCKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.81%

8.83%

-4.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.23%

15.86%

-5.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.73%

19.46%

-6.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.28%

22.94%

-5.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.71%

22.58%

-3.87%

CLEYX vs. FOCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLEYX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FOCKX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLEYX vs. FOCKX - Dividend Comparison

CLEYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than FOCKX's 5.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLEYX
Columbia Cornerstone Equity Fund Institutional Class 3
1.23%3.19%6.53%5.08%6.51%7.70%7.37%5.36%11.41%5.75%0.00%0.00%
FOCKX
Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K
5.83%7.56%16.42%0.09%3.97%11.34%6.18%7.49%7.81%4.85%3.25%5.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLEYX and FOCKX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FOCKX has higher volatility (8.83%) compared to CLEYX (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLEYX dropped -33.40% vs FOCKX's -53.33%.

FOCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLEYX and FOCKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer