CLBT vs. QTUM
CLBT (Cellebrite DI Ltd.) is a stock, while QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Over the past 3 years, CLBT returned 36.25%/yr vs 52.13%/yr for QTUM. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CLBT vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLBT achieves a -20.74% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 52.13% return.
CLBT
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 5.15%
- YTD
- -20.74%
- 6M
- -21.48%
- 1Y
- -14.23%
- 3Y*
- 36.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTUM
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 19.63%
- YTD
- 52.13%
- 6M
- 48.25%
- 1Y
- 92.25%
- 3Y*
- 52.13%
- 5Y*
- 28.96%
- 10Y*
- —
CLBT vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLBT Cellebrite DI Ltd. | -20.74% | -18.16% | 154.39% | 98.62% | -45.64% | -21.76% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 52.13% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | 9.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLBT and QTUM is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2021 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLBT vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
CLBT
QTUM
CLBT vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLBT | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.54 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | 6.08 | -6.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.72 | 22.92 | -23.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLBT | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 | 3.53 | -3.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 1.07 | -0.93 |
Drawdowns
CLBT vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLBT drawdown since its inception was -67.74%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLBT and QTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLBT | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.74% | -38.45% | -29.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.61% | -15.26% | -28.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.58% | -25.39% | -32.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.04% | -1.35% | -43.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.49% | -8.25% | -26.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.70% | 4.04% | +15.66% |
Volatility
CLBT vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) has a higher volatility of 21.52% compared to Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) at 9.78%. This indicates that CLBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLBT | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.52% | 9.78% | +11.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.94% | 20.32% | +19.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.52% | 26.27% | +25.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.35% | 26.56% | +23.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.35% | 27.16% | +23.19% |
Dividends
CLBT vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
CLBT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLBT Cellebrite DI Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.70% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLBT and QTUM have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLBT has higher volatility (21.52%) compared to QTUM (9.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLBT dropped -67.74% vs QTUM's -38.45%.
QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLBT and QTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer