CLBT vs. INTU
CLBT (Cellebrite DI Ltd.) and INTU (Intuit Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — CLBT in Software - Infrastructure, INTU in Software - Application. Over the past 3 years, CLBT returned 32.07%/yr vs -15.32%/yr for INTU. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CLBT vs. INTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLBT achieves a -11.59% return, which is significantly higher than INTU's -58.10% return.
CLBT
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 24.14%
- 6M
- -13.65%
- YTD
- -11.59%
- 1Y
- 9.25%
- 3Y*
- 32.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INTU
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- 6M
- -57.18%
- YTD
- -58.10%
- 1Y
- -62.82%
- 3Y*
- -15.32%
- 5Y*
- -10.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.85%
CLBT vs. INTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLBT Cellebrite DI Ltd. | -11.59% | -18.16% | 154.39% | 98.62% | -45.64% | -23.40% |
INTU Intuit Inc. | -58.10% | 6.09% | 1.16% | 61.76% | -39.12% | 13.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLBT and INTU is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2021 | 0.37 |
The correlation between CLBT and INTU shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.50 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CLBT:
$3.98B
INTU:
$75.21B
CLBT:
$0.29
INTU:
$16.37
CLBT:
55.70
INTU:
16.80
CLBT:
0.11
INTU:
1.00
CLBT:
8.06
INTU:
3.68
CLBT:
7.87
INTU:
3.68
CLBT:
$496.43M
INTU:
$20.93B
CLBT:
$416.33M
INTU:
$16.97B
CLBT:
$84.98M
INTU:
$6.65B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLBT vs. INTU — Risk / Return Rank
CLBT
INTU
CLBT vs. INTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) and Intuit Inc. (INTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLBT | INTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.70 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | -0.92 | +1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.38 | -1.64 | +2.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLBT vs. INTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLBT drawdown since its inception was -67.74%, smaller than the maximum INTU drawdown of -75.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLBT and INTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLBT | INTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.74% | -75.29% | +7.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.61% | -68.19% | +24.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.58% | -68.19% | +10.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -68.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -68.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.69% | -65.56% | +26.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.69% | -24.23% | -10.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.03% | 38.28% | -17.25% |
Volatility
CLBT vs. INTU - Volatility Comparison
Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) has a higher volatility of 14.02% compared to Intuit Inc. (INTU) at 11.58%. This indicates that CLBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLBT | INTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.02% | 11.58% | +2.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.91% | 43.23% | -1.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.17% | 45.43% | +7.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.35% | 37.82% | +12.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.35% | 34.09% | +16.26% |
Dividends
CLBT vs. INTU - Dividend Comparison
CLBT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLBT Cellebrite DI Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INTU Intuit Inc. | 1.75% | 0.65% | 0.60% | 0.52% | 0.72% | 0.38% | 0.57% | 0.74% | 0.83% | 0.89% | 1.08% | 1.09% |
Financials
CLBT vs. INTU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cellebrite DI Ltd. and Intuit Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CLBT vs. INTU - Profitability Comparison
CLBT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cellebrite DI Ltd. reported a gross profit of 105.88M and revenue of 128.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.5%.
INTU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Intuit Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.24B and revenue of 8.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.
CLBT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cellebrite DI Ltd. reported an operating income of 9.23M and revenue of 128.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.2%.
INTU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Intuit Inc. reported an operating income of 4.02B and revenue of 8.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 47.0%.
CLBT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cellebrite DI Ltd. reported a net income of 10.94M and revenue of 128.30M, resulting in a net margin of 8.5%.
INTU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Intuit Inc. reported a net income of 3.06B and revenue of 8.56B, resulting in a net margin of 35.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CLBT and INTU have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLBT has higher volatility (14.02%) compared to INTU (11.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLBT dropped -67.74% vs INTU's -75.29%.
CLBT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLBT and INTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer