CLBT vs. ABNB

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

CLBT (Cellebrite DI Ltd.) and ABNB (Airbnb, Inc.) are both stocks. CLBT operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while ABNB operates in Travel Services (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 3 years, CLBT returned 32.21%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for ABNB. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CLBT vs. ABNB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) and Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLBT achieves a -10.54% return, which is significantly lower than ABNB's 7.82% return.

CLBT

• 1D: 1.19%
• 1M: 25.62%
• 6M: -10.64%
• YTD: -10.54%
• 1Y: 10.56%
• 3Y*: 32.21%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ABNB

• 1D: -1.54%
• 1M: 10.62%
• 6M: 5.65%
• YTD: 7.82%
• 1Y: 8.11%
• 3Y*: 0.69%
• 5Y*: 1.02%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLBT vs. ABNB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CLBT Cellebrite DI Ltd.	-10.54%	-18.16%	154.39%	98.62%	-45.64%	-23.40%
ABNB Airbnb, Inc.	7.82%	3.28%	-3.47%	59.23%	-48.65%	6.71%

Correlation

The correlation between CLBT and ABNB is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2021	0.34

Fundamentals

Market Cap CLBT : $4.02B ABNB : $86.85B
EPS CLBT : $0.29 ABNB : $4.08
PE Ratio CLBT : 56.36 ABNB : 35.89
PEG Ratio CLBT : 0.11 ABNB : 1.01
PS Ratio CLBT : 8.16 ABNB : 7.14
PB Ratio CLBT : 7.96 ABNB : 11.65
Total Revenue (TTM) CLBT : $496.43M ABNB : $12.65B
Gross Profit (TTM) CLBT : $416.33M ABNB : $10.49B
EBITDA (TTM) CLBT : $84.98M ABNB : $2.57B

Return for Risk

CLBT vs. ABNB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLBT

CLBT Risk / Return Rank: 52
CLBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
CLBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
CLBT Omega Ratio Rank: 50
CLBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
CLBT Martin Ratio Rank: 52

ABNB

ABNB Risk / Return Rank: 53
ABNB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
ABNB Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
ABNB Omega Ratio Rank: 48
ABNB Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
ABNB Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLBT vs. ABNB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) and Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CLBT	ABNB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.20	0.27	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.72	0.57	+0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.07	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.24	0.38	-0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.50	0.81	-0.31

CLBT vs. ABNB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLBT Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is comparable to the ABNB Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLBT and ABNB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CLBT vs. ABNB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLBT drawdown since its inception was -67.74%, which is greater than ABNB's maximum drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLBT and ABNB.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLBT	ABNB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.74%	-61.96%	-5.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.61%	-21.54%	-22.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-57.58%	-37.16%	-20.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-60.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.96%	-32.52%	-5.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.69%	-36.09%	+1.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.06%	10.03%	+11.03%

Volatility

CLBT vs. ABNB - Volatility Comparison

Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) has a higher volatility of 13.99% compared to Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) at 10.34%. This indicates that CLBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABNB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLBT	ABNB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.99%	10.34%	+3.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.87%	24.02%	+17.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.12%	30.21%	+22.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.33%	43.82%	+6.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.33%	45.83%	+4.50%

Dividends

CLBT vs. ABNB - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLBT nor ABNB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CLBT vs. ABNB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cellebrite DI Ltd. and Airbnb, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CLBT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cellebrite DI Ltd. reported a gross profit of 105.88M and revenue of 128.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.5%.

ABNB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Airbnb, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.10B and revenue of 2.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.3%.

CLBT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cellebrite DI Ltd. reported an operating income of 9.23M and revenue of 128.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.2%.

ABNB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Airbnb, Inc. reported an operating income of 86.00M and revenue of 2.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.

CLBT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cellebrite DI Ltd. reported a net income of 10.94M and revenue of 128.30M, resulting in a net margin of 8.5%.

ABNB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Airbnb, Inc. reported a net income of 160.00M and revenue of 2.68B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLBT and ABNB in my portfolio?

CLBT and ABNB have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CLBT or ABNB?

CLBT has higher volatility (13.99%) compared to ABNB (10.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLBT dropped -67.74% vs ABNB's -61.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ABNB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.27 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.