PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CISS vs. RLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CISS vs. RLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in C3is Inc. (CISS) and RLX Technology Inc. (RLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CISS achieves a -94.19% return, which is significantly lower than RLX's -18.03% return.


CISS

1D
-11.79%
1M
-20.76%
YTD
-94.19%
6M
-93.93%
1Y
-99.63%
3Y*
-98.50%
5Y*
10Y*

RLX

1D
-2.66%
1M
-11.59%
YTD
-18.03%
6M
-16.60%
1Y
-9.15%
3Y*
3.83%
5Y*
-26.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CISS vs. RLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CISS
C3is Inc.
-94.19%-97.31%-98.92%-84.91%
RLX
RLX Technology Inc.
-18.03%8.27%8.60%16.80%

Correlation

The correlation between CISS and RLX is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023

0.03

The correlation between CISS and RLX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CISS:

$650.70K

RLX:

$2.40B

EPS

CISS:

$3.08

RLX:

CN¥0.76

PE Ratio

CISS:

0.61

RLX:

16.30

PS Ratio

CISS:

0.09

RLX:

3.66

PB Ratio

CISS:

0.01

RLX:

1.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

CISS:

$37.66M

RLX:

CN¥4.35B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CISS:

$8.58M

RLX:

CN¥1.44B

EBITDA (TTM)

CISS:

$12.89M

RLX:

CN¥513.06M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CISS vs. RLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CISS
CISS Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
CISS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CISS Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
CISS Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
CISS Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
CISS Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

RLX
RLX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
RLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
RLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CISS vs. RLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for C3is Inc. (CISS) and RLX Technology Inc. (RLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CISSRLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.57

0.97

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

-0.31

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.32

-0.69

-0.63

CISS vs. RLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CISS Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is lower than the RLX Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CISS and RLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CISS vs. RLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CISS drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum RLX drawdown of -96.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CISS and RLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CISSRLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-96.80%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-99.67%

-29.78%

-69.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-100.00%

-32.89%

-67.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-93.44%

-6.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-96.59%

-88.70%

-7.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

75.49%

13.31%

+62.18%

Volatility

CISS vs. RLX - Volatility Comparison

C3is Inc. (CISS) has a higher volatility of 21.10% compared to RLX Technology Inc. (RLX) at 8.98%. This indicates that CISS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CISSRLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.10%

8.98%

+12.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

114.70%

21.57%

+93.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

171.21%

31.37%

+139.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

143.10%

74.03%

+69.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

143.10%

80.75%

+62.35%

Dividends

CISS vs. RLX - Dividend Comparison

CISS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.01%.


PositionTTM202520242023
CISS
C3is Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RLX
RLX Technology Inc.
6.01%0.43%0.46%0.50%

Financials

CISS vs. RLX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between C3is Inc. and RLX Technology Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
11.58M
1.46B
(CISS) Total Revenue
(RLX) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CISS values in USD, RLX values in CNY

CISS vs. RLX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between C3is Inc. and RLX Technology Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-60.0%-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
53.5%
33.6%
Portfolio components
CISS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, C3is Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.19M and revenue of 11.58M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.5%.

RLX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RLX Technology Inc. reported a gross profit of 490.84M and revenue of 1.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.6%.

CISS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, C3is Inc. reported an operating income of 5.26M and revenue of 11.58M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.5%.

RLX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RLX Technology Inc. reported an operating income of 243.16M and revenue of 1.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.7%.

CISS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, C3is Inc. reported a net income of 3.20M and revenue of 11.58M, resulting in a net margin of 27.7%.

RLX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RLX Technology Inc. reported a net income of 282.42M and revenue of 1.46B, resulting in a net margin of 19.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CISS and RLX have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CISS has higher volatility (21.10%) compared to RLX (8.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CISS dropped -100.00% vs RLX's -96.80%.

RLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.29 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CISS and RLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer