CISS vs. BOXL

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

CISS (C3is Inc.) and BOXL (Boxlight Corporation) are both stocks. CISS operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials), while BOXL operates in Communication Equipment (Technology). Over the past 3 years, CISS returned -99.04%/yr vs -80.53%/yr for BOXL. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

CISS vs. BOXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in C3is Inc. (CISS) and Boxlight Corporation (BOXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CISS achieves a -99.63% return, which is significantly lower than BOXL's -70.20% return.

CISS

• 1D: -12.50%
• 1M: -93.35%
• 6M: -99.07%
• YTD: -99.63%
• 1Y: -99.97%
• 3Y*: -99.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -99.35%

BOXL

• 1D: 7.42%
• 1M: -39.20%
• 6M: -58.81%
• YTD: -70.20%
• 1Y: -95.70%
• 3Y*: -80.53%
• 5Y*: -74.40%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -61.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BOXL Boxlight Corporation	$84.51K	$107.24K	$2.29M
CISS C3is Inc.	$9.53M	$4.63M	$3.51M

CISS vs. BOXL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CISS C3is Inc.	-99.63%	-97.31%	-98.92%	-84.91%
BOXL Boxlight Corporation	-70.20%	-85.15%	-64.34%	-43.68%

Correlation

The correlation between CISS and BOXL is 0.10, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023	0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap CISS : $21.00K BOXL : $482.28K
EPS CISS : $2.63 BOXL : -$82.58
PS Ratio CISS : 0.01 BOXL : 0.01
Total Revenue (TTM) CISS : $37.66M BOXL : $82.61M
Gross Profit (TTM) CISS : $8.58M BOXL : $27.37M
EBITDA (TTM) CISS : $12.89M BOXL : $3.81M

Return for Risk

CISS vs. BOXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CISS

CISS Risk / Return Rank: 8
CISS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
CISS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CISS Omega Ratio Rank: 0
CISS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
CISS Martin Ratio Rank: 15

BOXL

BOXL Risk / Return Rank: 14
BOXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
BOXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
BOXL Omega Ratio Rank: 12
BOXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BOXL Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CISS vs. BOXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for C3is Inc. (CISS) and Boxlight Corporation (BOXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CISS	BOXL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.48	-0.38	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.93	-1.21	-1.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.53	0.86	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.00	-0.97	-0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.22	-1.15	-0.06

CISS vs. BOXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CISS Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is comparable to the BOXL Sharpe Ratio of -0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CISS and BOXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CISS vs. BOXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CISS drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum BOXL drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CISS and BOXL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CISS	BOXL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-100.00%	-99.98%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-99.98%	-98.41%	-1.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-100.00%	-99.35%	-0.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-99.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-100.00%	-99.98%	-0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-96.70%	-87.69%	-9.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	82.02%	82.99%	-0.97%

Volatility

CISS vs. BOXL - Volatility Comparison

C3is Inc. (CISS) has a higher volatility of 186.50% compared to Boxlight Corporation (BOXL) at 27.61%. This indicates that CISS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CISS	BOXL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	186.50%	27.61%	+158.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	212.31%	92.97%	+119.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	209.89%	253.35%	-43.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	156.88%	181.43%	-24.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	156.88%	170.81%	-13.93%

Dividends

CISS vs. BOXL - Dividend Comparison

Neither CISS nor BOXL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CISS and BOXL in my portfolio?

CISS and BOXL have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CISS or BOXL?

CISS has higher volatility (186.50%) compared to BOXL (27.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CISS dropped -100.00% vs BOXL's -99.98%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.38 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.