RLX vs. MLGO
RLX (RLX Technology Inc.) and MLGO (MicroAlgo Inc.) are both stocks. RLX operates in Tobacco (Consumer Defensive), while MLGO operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 5 years, RLX returned -26.33%/yr vs -84.63%/yr for MLGO. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RLX vs. MLGO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RLX achieves a -9.07% return, which is significantly lower than MLGO's 15.61% return.
RLX
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- -5.58%
- YTD
- -9.07%
- 6M
- -11.35%
- 1Y
- 2.73%
- 3Y*
- 6.27%
- 5Y*
- -26.33%
- 10Y*
- —
MLGO
- 1D
- -14.98%
- 1M
- 28.39%
- YTD
- 15.61%
- 6M
- -20.40%
- 1Y
- -86.69%
- 3Y*
- -92.78%
- 5Y*
- -84.63%
- 10Y*
- —
RLX vs. MLGO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RLX RLX Technology Inc. | -9.07% | 8.27% | 8.60% | -12.65% | -41.03% | -56.67% |
MLGO MicroAlgo Inc. | 15.61% | -96.08% | -97.94% | -27.04% | -87.60% | 3.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between RLX and MLGO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2021 | 0.04 |
Fundamentals
RLX:
$0.76
MLGO:
$2.45
RLX:
2.67
MLGO:
2.09
RLX:
0.60
MLGO:
0.23
RLX:
$4.35B
MLGO:
$61.17M
RLX:
$1.44B
MLGO:
$16.42M
RLX:
$513.06M
MLGO:
$3.58M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RLX vs. MLGO — Risk / Return Rank
RLX
MLGO
RLX vs. MLGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RLX Technology Inc. (RLX) and MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RLX | MLGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.09 | -0.77 | +0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.38 | -1.76 | +2.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.81 | +0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.11 | -0.95 | +1.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.23 | -1.10 | +1.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RLX | MLGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 | -0.77 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | -0.18 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.49 | -0.18 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
RLX vs. MLGO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RLX drawdown since its inception was -96.80%, roughly equal to the maximum MLGO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLX and MLGO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RLX | MLGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.80% | -100.00% | +3.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.02% | -91.65% | +67.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.89% | -99.99% | +67.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.47% | -100.00% | +9.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.72% | -99.99% | +7.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.72% | -63.14% | -25.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.06% | 79.06% | -67.00% |
Volatility
RLX vs. MLGO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RLX Technology Inc. (RLX) is 9.65%, while MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO) has a volatility of 47.32%. This indicates that RLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RLX | MLGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.65% | 47.32% | -37.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.22% | 75.14% | -53.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.14% | 112.66% | -81.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.30% | 481.13% | -406.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.91% | 474.38% | -394.47% |
Dividends
RLX vs. MLGO - Dividend Comparison
RLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.42%, while MLGO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MLGO MicroAlgo Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RLX RLX Technology Inc. | 5.42% | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.50% |
Financials
RLX vs. MLGO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RLX Technology Inc. and MicroAlgo Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
RLX and MLGO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLGO has higher volatility (47.32%) compared to RLX (9.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLX dropped -96.80% vs MLGO's -100.00%.
RLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RLX and MLGO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer