CISS vs. KITT
CISS (C3is Inc.) and KITT (Nauticus Robotics Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — CISS in Marine Shipping, KITT in Aerospace & Defense. Over the past 3 years, CISS returned -99.04%/yr vs -94.48%/yr for KITT. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CISS vs. KITT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CISS achieves a -99.63% return, which is significantly lower than KITT's -85.79% return.
CISS
- 1D
- -12.50%
- 1M
- -93.35%
- 6M
- -99.07%
- YTD
- -99.63%
- 1Y
- -99.97%
- 3Y*
- -99.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -99.35%
KITT
- 1D
- 5.27%
- 1M
- -22.76%
- 6M
- -89.61%
- YTD
- -85.79%
- 1Y
- -98.68%
- 3Y*
- -94.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -87.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
CISS C3is Inc. | $9.53M | $4.63M | $3.51M |
| $136.94K | $216.68K | $448.95K |
CISS vs. KITT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CISS C3is Inc. | -99.63% | -97.31% | -98.92% | -84.91% |
KITT Nauticus Robotics Inc. | -85.79% | -94.50% | -93.65% | -66.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between CISS and KITT is 0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023 | 0.06 |
Fundamentals
CISS:
$21.00K
KITT:
$622.27K
CISS:
$2.63
KITT:
-$7.73
CISS:
0.01
KITT:
0.87
CISS:
0.00
KITT:
0.83
CISS:
$37.66M
KITT:
$5.27M
CISS:
$8.58M
KITT:
-$7.06M
CISS:
$12.89M
KITT:
-$20.22M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CISS vs. KITT — Risk / Return Rank
CISS
KITT
CISS vs. KITT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for C3is Inc. (CISS) and Nauticus Robotics Inc. (KITT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CISS | KITT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.53 | 0.68 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | -1.00 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | -1.17 | -0.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CISS vs. KITT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CISS drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum KITT drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CISS and KITT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CISS | KITT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -100.00% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -99.98% | -98.91% | -1.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -100.00% | -99.99% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -100.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -100.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -96.70% | -70.90% | -25.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 82.02% | 84.39% | -2.37% |
Volatility
CISS vs. KITT - Volatility Comparison
C3is Inc. (CISS) has a higher volatility of 186.50% compared to Nauticus Robotics Inc. (KITT) at 27.70%. This indicates that CISS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KITT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CISS | KITT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 186.50% | 27.70% | +158.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 212.31% | 79.08% | +133.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 209.89% | 175.10% | +34.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 156.88% | 151.16% | +5.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 156.88% | 151.16% | +5.72% |
Dividends
CISS vs. KITT - Dividend Comparison
Neither CISS nor KITT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CISS vs. KITT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between C3is Inc. and Nauticus Robotics Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CISS and KITT have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CISS has higher volatility (186.50%) compared to KITT (27.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CISS dropped -100.00% vs KITT's -100.00%.
CISS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.48 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CISS and KITT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer