KITT vs. CXAI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Nauticus Robotics Inc. (KITT) and CXApp Inc. (CXAI).

Performance

KITT vs. CXAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nauticus Robotics Inc. (KITT) and CXApp Inc. (CXAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KITT vs. CXAI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
KITT Nauticus Robotics Inc.	-35.02%	-94.50%	-93.65%	-81.88%	-62.45%	2.05%
CXAI CXApp Inc.	-45.63%	-81.76%	41.09%	-87.19%	0.80%	1.22%

Fundamentals

EPS KITT : -$39.50 CXAI : -$0.57
PS Ratio KITT : 0.38 CXAI : 0.91
Total Revenue (TTM) KITT : $4.69M CXAI : $4.11M
Gross Profit (TTM) KITT : -$6.01M CXAI : $3.43M
EBITDA (TTM) KITT : -$141.95M CXAI : -$7.91M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KITT achieves a -35.02% return, which is significantly higher than CXAI's -45.63% return.

KITT

• 1D: 2.78%
• 1M: -33.30%
• YTD: -35.02%
• 6M: -82.68%
• 1Y: -93.97%
• 3Y*: -91.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CXAI

• 1D: -9.75%
• 1M: -1.47%
• YTD: -45.63%
• 6M: -75.51%
• 1Y: -79.94%
• 3Y*: -53.63%
• 5Y*: -55.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

KITT vs. CXAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KITT

KITT Risk / Return Rank: 8
KITT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
KITT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
KITT Omega Ratio Rank: 7
KITT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
KITT Martin Ratio Rank: 11

CXAI

CXAI Risk / Return Rank: 11
CXAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
CXAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
CXAI Omega Ratio Rank: 11
CXAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
CXAI Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KITT vs. CXAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nauticus Robotics Inc. (KITT) and CXApp Inc. (CXAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KITT	CXAI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.53	-0.63	+0.10
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.61	-1.21	-0.40
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	0.87	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	-0.88	-0.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.44	-1.39	-0.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KITT vs. CXAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KITT Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is comparable to the CXAI Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KITT and CXAI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KITT	CXAI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.53	-0.63	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.25	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.55	-0.25	-0.30

Correlation

The correlation between KITT and CXAI is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

KITT vs. CXAI - Dividend Comparison

Neither KITT nor CXAI has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

KITT vs. CXAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KITT drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, roughly equal to the maximum CXAI drawdown of -98.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KITT and CXAI.

Drawdown Indicators

	KITT	CXAI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.99%	-98.80%	-1.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-95.31%	-88.33%	-6.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-98.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.99%	-98.70%	-1.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-68.87%	-50.46%	-18.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	65.61%	56.19%	+9.42%

Volatility

KITT vs. CXAI - Volatility Comparison

Nauticus Robotics Inc. (KITT) has a higher volatility of 49.01% compared to CXApp Inc. (CXAI) at 46.63%. This indicates that KITT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CXAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KITT	CXAI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	49.01%	46.63%	+2.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	133.13%	80.77%	+52.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	176.11%	126.66%	+49.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	154.42%	217.44%	-63.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	154.42%	214.22%	-59.80%

Financials