KITT vs. CXAI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KITT (Nauticus Robotics Inc.) and CXAI (CXApp Inc.) are both stocks. KITT operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while CXAI operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 3 years, KITT returned -93.04%/yr vs -74.83%/yr for CXAI. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

KITT vs. CXAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nauticus Robotics Inc. (KITT) and CXApp Inc. (CXAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KITT achieves a -71.82% return, which is significantly lower than CXAI's -52.05% return.

KITT

• 1D: -2.26%
• 1M: -22.07%
• YTD: -71.82%
• 6M: -86.14%
• 1Y: -97.49%
• 3Y*: -93.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CXAI

• 1D: -21.58%
• 1M: -2.15%
• YTD: -52.05%
• 6M: -58.78%
• 1Y: -84.84%
• 3Y*: -74.83%
• 5Y*: -56.19%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KITT vs. CXAI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
KITT Nauticus Robotics Inc.	-71.82%	-94.50%	-93.65%	-81.88%	-62.45%	2.05%
CXAI CXApp Inc.	-52.05%	-81.76%	41.09%	-87.19%	0.80%	1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between KITT and CXAI is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2021	0.14

Fundamentals

Market Cap KITT : $11.56M CXAI : $7.20M
EPS KITT : -$8.89 CXAI : -$0.58
PS Ratio KITT : 1.51 CXAI : 1.37
PB Ratio KITT : 1.65 CXAI : 0.45
Total Revenue (TTM) KITT : $5.27M CXAI : $3.20M
Gross Profit (TTM) KITT : -$7.06M CXAI : $1.92M
EBITDA (TTM) KITT : -$20.22M CXAI : -$11.81M

Return for Risk

KITT vs. CXAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KITT

KITT Risk / Return Rank: 7
KITT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
KITT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
KITT Omega Ratio Rank: 3
KITT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
KITT Martin Ratio Rank: 12

CXAI

CXAI Risk / Return Rank: 6
CXAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
CXAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
CXAI Omega Ratio Rank: 6
CXAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
CXAI Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KITT vs. CXAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nauticus Robotics Inc. (KITT) and CXApp Inc. (CXAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KITT	CXAI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.55	-0.80	+0.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-2.40	-1.77	-0.63
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.74	0.81	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.00	-0.97	-0.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.27	-1.42	+0.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KITT vs. CXAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KITT Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is higher than the CXAI Sharpe Ratio of -0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KITT and CXAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KITT	CXAI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.55	-0.80	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.26	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.57	-0.26	-0.31

Drawdowns

KITT vs. CXAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KITT drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, roughly equal to the maximum CXAI drawdown of -99.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KITT and CXAI.

Drawdown Indicators

	KITT	CXAI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.99%	-99.01%	-0.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-98.01%	-87.79%	-10.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-99.97%	-98.99%	-0.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-99.01%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.99%	-98.85%	-1.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-70.00%	-52.05%	-17.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	76.84%	59.69%	+17.15%

Volatility

KITT vs. CXAI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nauticus Robotics Inc. (KITT) is 28.46%, while CXApp Inc. (CXAI) has a volatility of 51.86%. This indicates that KITT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CXAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KITT	CXAI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.46%	51.86%	-23.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	130.06%	92.58%	+37.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	176.11%	106.86%	+69.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	152.88%	219.04%	-66.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	152.88%	212.22%	-59.34%

Dividends

KITT vs. CXAI - Dividend Comparison

Neither KITT nor CXAI has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KITT and CXAI in my portfolio?

KITT and CXAI have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KITT or CXAI?

CXAI has higher volatility (51.86%) compared to KITT (28.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KITT dropped -99.99% vs CXAI's -99.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KITT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.55 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.