PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOXL vs. MLGO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BOXL vs. MLGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boxlight Corporation (BOXL) and MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOXL achieves a -48.82% return, which is significantly lower than MLGO's 15.61% return.


BOXL

1D
-4.07%
1M
-17.92%
YTD
-48.82%
6M
-82.86%
1Y
-91.71%
3Y*
-77.17%
5Y*
-73.15%
10Y*

MLGO

1D
-14.98%
1M
28.39%
YTD
15.61%
6M
-20.40%
1Y
-86.69%
3Y*
-92.78%
5Y*
-84.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOXL vs. MLGO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BOXL
Boxlight Corporation
-48.82%-85.15%-64.34%-56.97%-77.48%-39.47%
MLGO
MicroAlgo Inc.
15.61%-96.08%-97.94%-27.04%-87.60%3.70%

Correlation

The correlation between BOXL and MLGO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2021

0.08

The correlation between BOXL and MLGO shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

BOXL:

-$63.44

MLGO:

$2.45

PS Ratio

BOXL:

0.00

MLGO:

0.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

BOXL:

$82.61M

MLGO:

$61.17M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BOXL:

$27.37M

MLGO:

$16.42M

EBITDA (TTM)

BOXL:

$3.81M

MLGO:

$3.58M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOXL vs. MLGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOXL
BOXL Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
BOXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOXL Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BOXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOXL Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

MLGO
MLGO Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
MLGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLGO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
MLGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLGO Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOXL vs. MLGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boxlight Corporation (BOXL) and MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOXLMLGODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.37

-0.77

+0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.63

-1.76

+1.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

0.81

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.94

-0.95

0.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.24

-1.10

-0.14

BOXL vs. MLGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOXL Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is higher than the MLGO Sharpe Ratio of -0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOXL and MLGO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOXLMLGODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.37

-0.77

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.41

-0.18

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.35

-0.18

-0.17

Drawdowns

BOXL vs. MLGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOXL drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, roughly equal to the maximum MLGO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOXL and MLGO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOXLMLGODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.97%

-100.00%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-97.36%

-91.65%

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.09%

-99.99%

+0.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.89%

-100.00%

+0.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.97%

-99.99%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-87.08%

-63.14%

-23.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

73.62%

79.06%

-5.44%

Volatility

BOXL vs. MLGO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Boxlight Corporation (BOXL) is 29.08%, while MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO) has a volatility of 47.32%. This indicates that BOXL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOXLMLGODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.08%

47.32%

-18.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

99.43%

75.14%

+24.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

249.30%

112.66%

+136.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

180.14%

481.13%

-300.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

171.40%

474.38%

-302.98%

Dividends

BOXL vs. MLGO - Dividend Comparison

Neither BOXL nor MLGO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

BOXL vs. MLGO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Boxlight Corporation and MicroAlgo Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M50.00M60.00M70.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober0
13.13M
(BOXL) Total Revenue
(MLGO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BOXL and MLGO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLGO has higher volatility (47.32%) compared to BOXL (29.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOXL dropped -99.97% vs MLGO's -100.00%.

BOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.37 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOXL and MLGO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer