PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CISMX vs. VMVIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CISMX vs. VMVIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund (VMVIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CISMX achieves a -0.48% return, which is significantly lower than VMVIX's 10.90% return. Over the past 10 years, CISMX has underperformed VMVIX with an annualized return of 5.97%, while VMVIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.36% annualized return.


CISMX

1D
-1.03%
1M
0.32%
YTD
-0.48%
6M
-0.89%
1Y
-0.21%
3Y*
-0.02%
5Y*
-1.85%
10Y*
5.97%

VMVIX

1D
0.85%
1M
1.52%
YTD
10.90%
6M
11.71%
1Y
22.73%
3Y*
16.21%
5Y*
8.26%
10Y*
10.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CISMX vs. VMVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CISMX
Clarkston Partners Fund
-0.48%-8.37%4.49%6.41%-0.40%7.94%17.42%23.98%-7.25%12.84%
VMVIX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund
10.90%11.22%13.48%10.00%-8.00%28.60%2.33%27.85%-12.57%16.91%

Correlation

The correlation between CISMX and VMVIX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2015

0.87

The correlation between CISMX and VMVIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CISMX vs. VMVIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CISMX
CISMX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CISMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CISMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CISMX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CISMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CISMX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

VMVIX
VMVIX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VMVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
VMVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CISMX vs. VMVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund (VMVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CISMXVMVIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.36

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

3.41

-3.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.12

13.03

-12.91

CISMX vs. VMVIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CISMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the VMVIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CISMX and VMVIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CISMXVMVIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

2.08

-2.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

0.52

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.55

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.43

-0.07

Drawdowns

CISMX vs. VMVIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CISMX drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, smaller than the maximum VMVIX drawdown of -61.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CISMX and VMVIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CISMXVMVIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.80%

-61.61%

+27.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.54%

-6.96%

-3.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.19%

-18.94%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.19%

-19.81%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.80%

-43.08%

+9.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.82%

0.00%

-14.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.69%

-8.46%

+1.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.68%

1.82%

+2.86%

Volatility

CISMX vs. VMVIX - Volatility Comparison

Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX) has a higher volatility of 4.55% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund (VMVIX) at 2.66%. This indicates that CISMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CISMXVMVIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

2.66%

+1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.71%

8.18%

+4.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.05%

11.42%

+5.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.48%

16.02%

+1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.29%

18.79%

-0.50%

CISMX vs. VMVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CISMX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than VMVIX's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

CISMX vs. VMVIX - Dividend Comparison

CISMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than VMVIX's 1.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CISMX
Clarkston Partners Fund
4.67%4.65%1.05%3.76%16.95%0.81%3.73%3.79%7.15%1.30%1.17%0.09%
VMVIX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund
1.76%1.42%1.99%2.15%2.15%1.67%2.26%1.95%2.60%1.75%1.81%1.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


CISMX and VMVIX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CISMX has higher volatility (4.55%) compared to VMVIX (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CISMX dropped -33.80% vs VMVIX's -61.61%.

VMVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CISMX and VMVIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer