PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMVIX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMVIX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund (VMVIX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VMVIX having a 11.02% return and FCNTX slightly lower at 10.97%. Over the past 10 years, VMVIX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 10.38%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.96% annualized return.


VMVIX

1D
0.05%
1M
0.73%
YTD
11.02%
6M
9.98%
1Y
23.19%
3Y*
14.72%
5Y*
9.45%
10Y*
10.38%

FCNTX

1D
1.24%
1M
4.18%
YTD
10.97%
6M
10.79%
1Y
26.78%
3Y*
27.28%
5Y*
15.45%
10Y*
17.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMVIX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMVIX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund
11.02%11.22%13.48%10.00%-8.00%28.60%2.33%27.85%-12.57%16.91%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
10.97%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between VMVIX and FCNTX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2006

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between VMVIX and FCNTX has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMVIX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMVIX
VMVIX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VMVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VMVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMVIX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund (VMVIX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VMVIXFCNTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.31

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

2.31

+1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.92

9.69

+3.23

VMVIX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMVIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMVIX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VMVIX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMVIX drawdown since its inception was -61.61%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMVIX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMVIXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.61%

-49.19%

-12.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.96%

-11.30%

+4.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.94%

-19.75%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.81%

-32.59%

+12.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.08%

-32.59%

-10.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

-0.48%

-1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.44%

-8.15%

-0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

2.69%

-0.87%

Volatility

VMVIX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund (VMVIX) is 3.43%, while Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 5.94%. This indicates that VMVIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMVIXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

5.94%

-2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.39%

11.74%

-3.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.62%

14.92%

-3.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.02%

19.30%

-3.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.80%

19.74%

-0.94%

VMVIX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMVIX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

VMVIX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

VMVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than FCNTX's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.21%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
VMVIX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund
1.76%1.42%1.99%2.15%2.15%1.67%2.26%1.95%2.60%1.75%1.81%1.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMVIX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCNTX has higher volatility (5.94%) compared to VMVIX (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMVIX dropped -61.61% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

VMVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMVIX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer