CIPMX vs. WWNPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Champlain Mid Cap Fund (CIPMX) and Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX).
CIPMX is managed by Champlain Funds. It was launched on Jun 30, 2008. WWNPX is managed by Kinetics. It was launched on Dec 31, 1999.
Performance
CIPMX vs. WWNPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CIPMX vs. WWNPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIPMX Champlain Mid Cap Fund | -11.25% | 1.44% | 13.94% | 15.40% | -26.53% | 24.48% | 29.03% | 26.27% | 3.41% | 13.62% |
WWNPX Kinetics Paradigm Fund | 36.66% | -14.61% | 88.34% | -16.97% | 29.18% | 38.14% | 3.38% | 30.47% | -5.24% | 28.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIPMX achieves a -11.25% return, which is significantly lower than WWNPX's 36.66% return. Over the past 10 years, CIPMX has underperformed WWNPX with an annualized return of 9.07%, while WWNPX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.54% annualized return.
CIPMX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -10.29%
- YTD
- -11.25%
- 6M
- -11.52%
- 1Y
- -4.55%
- 3Y*
- 3.95%
- 5Y*
- 0.88%
- 10Y*
- 9.07%
WWNPX
- 1D
- -6.34%
- 1M
- -9.27%
- YTD
- 36.66%
- 6M
- 24.06%
- 1Y
- 3.73%
- 3Y*
- 30.25%
- 5Y*
- 16.10%
- 10Y*
- 20.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CIPMX vs. WWNPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIPMX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is lower than WWNPX's 1.64% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CIPMX vs. WWNPX — Risk / Return Rank
CIPMX
WWNPX
CIPMX vs. WWNPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Champlain Mid Cap Fund (CIPMX) and Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIPMX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | 0.13 | -0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | 0.45 | -0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.06 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | 0.07 | -0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | 0.12 | -1.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIPMX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 | 0.13 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.50 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.73 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.55 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between CIPMX and WWNPX is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CIPMX vs. WWNPX - Dividend Comparison
CIPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.48%, more than WWNPX's 6.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIPMX Champlain Mid Cap Fund | 20.48% | 18.17% | 15.31% | 0.30% | 1.44% | 10.24% | 4.62% | 4.06% | 6.70% | 0.00% | 4.28% | 8.32% |
WWNPX Kinetics Paradigm Fund | 6.01% | 8.21% | 2.95% | 5.65% | 2.00% | 1.67% | 2.15% | 1.00% | 10.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CIPMX vs. WWNPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIPMX drawdown since its inception was -45.33%, smaller than the maximum WWNPX drawdown of -67.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIPMX and WWNPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIPMX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.33% | -67.87% | +22.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.68% | -32.61% | +17.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.20% | -41.13% | +7.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.84% | -43.51% | +9.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.85% | -17.17% | +2.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -13.85% | +5.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.41% | 20.15% | -15.74% |
Volatility
CIPMX vs. WWNPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Champlain Mid Cap Fund (CIPMX) is 4.41%, while Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX) has a volatility of 9.21%. This indicates that CIPMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WWNPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CIPMX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 9.21% | -4.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.68% | 24.60% | -13.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.84% | 36.52% | -16.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 32.56% | -13.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.82% | 28.17% | -9.35% |