CIPMX vs. FBGRX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CIPMX (Champlain Mid Cap Fund) and FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - CIPMX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Champlain Funds, while FBGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, CIPMX returned 9.76%/yr vs 22.38%/yr for FBGRX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CIPMX charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FBGRX.

Performance

CIPMX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Champlain Mid Cap Fund (CIPMX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIPMX achieves a -2.90% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 16.84% return. Over the past 10 years, CIPMX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 9.76%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.38% annualized return.

CIPMX

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: -2.90%
• 6M: -4.36%
• 1Y: -1.76%
• 3Y*: 6.50%
• 5Y*: 0.95%
• 10Y*: 9.76%

FBGRX

• 1D: -1.86%
• 1M: 2.83%
• YTD: 16.84%
• 6M: 15.60%
• 1Y: 40.72%
• 3Y*: 30.85%
• 5Y*: 15.32%
• 10Y*: 22.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIPMX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CIPMX Champlain Mid Cap Fund	-2.90%	1.44%	13.94%	15.40%	-26.53%	24.48%	29.03%	26.27%	3.41%	13.62%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	16.84%	19.91%	39.77%	55.61%	-38.45%	22.64%	62.20%	33.43%	1.02%	36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between CIPMX and FBGRX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2008	0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between CIPMX and FBGRX has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

CIPMX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIPMX

CIPMX Risk / Return Rank: 2
CIPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CIPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
CIPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CIPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
CIPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

FBGRX

FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 68
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIPMX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Champlain Mid Cap Fund (CIPMX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CIPMX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.06	2.23	-2.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.02	2.89	-2.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.38	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.06	3.31	-3.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.15	13.66	-13.81

CIPMX vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIPMX Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIPMX and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CIPMX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIPMX drawdown since its inception was -45.33%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIPMX and FBGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIPMX	FBGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.33%	-58.64%	+13.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.68%	-12.65%	-2.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.11%	-27.07%	+6.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.20%	-43.08%	+9.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.84%	-43.08%	+9.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.84%	-2.19%	-4.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.96%	-12.51%	+4.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.83%	3.06%	+2.77%

Volatility

CIPMX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Champlain Mid Cap Fund (CIPMX) is 5.11%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 8.03%. This indicates that CIPMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CIPMX	FBGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.11%	8.03%	-2.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.42%	14.72%	-3.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.05%	18.85%	-3.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.09%	25.09%	-6.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.89%	23.80%	-4.91%

CIPMX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIPMX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

CIPMX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

CIPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.72%, more than FBGRX's 1.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIPMX Champlain Mid Cap Fund	18.72%	18.17%	15.31%	0.30%	1.44%	10.24%	4.62%	4.06%	6.70%	0.00%	4.28%	8.32%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	1.63%	1.90%	5.95%	0.93%	0.57%	8.73%	6.40%	3.70%	6.32%	4.23%	4.05%	5.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CIPMX and FBGRX in my portfolio?

CIPMX and FBGRX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CIPMX or FBGRX?

FBGRX has higher volatility (8.03%) compared to CIPMX (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIPMX dropped -45.33% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.