CIPMX vs. PEXL
CIPMX (Champlain Mid Cap Fund) and PEXL (Pacer US Export Leaders ETF) are both funds - CIPMX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Champlain Funds, while PEXL is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Export Leaders Index. Over the past 5 years, CIPMX returned 2.37%/yr vs 13.39%/yr for PEXL. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CIPMX charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PEXL.
Performance
CIPMX vs. PEXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIPMX achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than PEXL's 22.42% return.
CIPMX
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- 7.57%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 0.42%
- 1Y
- 1.16%
- 3Y*
- 8.25%
- 5Y*
- 2.37%
- 10Y*
- 9.79%
PEXL
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- 10.56%
- YTD
- 22.42%
- 6M
- 25.49%
- 1Y
- 55.27%
- 3Y*
- 22.28%
- 5Y*
- 13.39%
- 10Y*
- —
CIPMX vs. PEXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIPMX Champlain Mid Cap Fund | 0.56% | 1.44% | 13.94% | 15.40% | -26.53% | 24.48% | 29.03% | 26.27% | -7.03% |
PEXL Pacer US Export Leaders ETF | 22.42% | 27.33% | 5.79% | 24.40% | -20.41% | 30.12% | 25.02% | 39.86% | -17.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIPMX and PEXL is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2018 | 0.82 |
The correlation between CIPMX and PEXL shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIPMX vs. PEXL — Risk / Return Rank
CIPMX
PEXL
CIPMX vs. PEXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Champlain Mid Cap Fund (CIPMX) and Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIPMX | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.08 | 3.12 | -3.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.22 | 4.07 | -3.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.52 | -0.49 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.09 | 4.85 | -4.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.24 | 20.93 | -20.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIPMX | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 | 3.12 | -3.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.62 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.65 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
CIPMX vs. PEXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIPMX drawdown since its inception was -45.33%, which is greater than PEXL's maximum drawdown of -36.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIPMX and PEXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIPMX | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.33% | -36.76% | -8.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.68% | -11.43% | -3.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.11% | -24.72% | +4.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.20% | -30.44% | -2.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.52% | 0.00% | -3.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.96% | -6.72% | -1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.66% | 2.65% | +3.01% |
Volatility
CIPMX vs. PEXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Champlain Mid Cap Fund (CIPMX) is 3.95%, while Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL) has a volatility of 5.44%. This indicates that CIPMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIPMX | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | 5.44% | -1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.98% | 13.10% | -2.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.78% | 17.80% | -3.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.04% | 21.86% | -2.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.87% | 24.05% | -5.18% |
CIPMX vs. PEXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIPMX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than PEXL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIPMX vs. PEXL - Dividend Comparison
CIPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.07%, more than PEXL's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIPMX Champlain Mid Cap Fund | 18.07% | 18.17% | 15.31% | 0.30% | 1.44% | 10.24% | 4.62% | 4.06% | 6.70% | 0.00% | 4.28% | 8.32% |
PEXL Pacer US Export Leaders ETF | 0.34% | 0.44% | 0.48% | 0.48% | 0.60% | 0.22% | 0.48% | 0.49% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIPMX and PEXL have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PEXL has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to CIPMX (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIPMX dropped -45.33% vs PEXL's -36.76%.
PEXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CIPMX and PEXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer