PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIPLA.NS vs. NVS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CIPLA.NS vs. NVS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a ₹10,000 investment in Cipla Limited (CIPLA.NS) and Novartis AG (NVS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CIPLA.NS is traded in INR, while NVS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NVS values have been converted to INR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIPLA.NS achieves a -9.01% return, which is significantly lower than NVS's 13.71% return. Over the past 10 years, CIPLA.NS has underperformed NVS with an annualized return of 12.18%, while NVS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.76% annualized return.


CIPLA.NS

1D
-0.30%
1M
3.01%
YTD
-9.01%
6M
-8.81%
1Y
-5.66%
3Y*
13.52%
5Y*
8.57%
10Y*
12.18%

NVS

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.59%
YTD
13.71%
6M
16.83%
1Y
41.80%
3Y*
23.00%
5Y*
20.25%
10Y*
13.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIPLA.NS vs. NVS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CIPLA.NS
Cipla Limited
-9.01%-0.10%23.72%16.77%14.52%15.78%73.26%-7.42%-14.21%7.36%
NVS
Novartis AG
13.71%53.99%3.05%16.94%19.67%-1.74%5.94%16.81%15.54%12.00%

Correlation

The correlation between CIPLA.NS and NVS is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2007

0.01

The correlation between CIPLA.NS and NVS shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.05 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIPLA.NS vs. NVS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIPLA.NS
CIPLA.NS Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
CIPLA.NS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIPLA.NS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIPLA.NS Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
CIPLA.NS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIPLA.NS Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

NVS
NVS Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVS Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVS Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIPLA.NS vs. NVS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cipla Limited (CIPLA.NS) and Novartis AG (NVS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIPLA.NSNVSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.27

2.08

-2.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.26

2.77

-3.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.35

-0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.20

4.66

-4.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.41

11.43

-11.84

CIPLA.NS vs. NVS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIPLA.NS Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the NVS Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIPLA.NS and NVS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CIPLA.NSNVSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

2.08

-2.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

1.10

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.72

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.70

-0.67

Drawdowns

CIPLA.NS vs. NVS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIPLA.NS drawdown since its inception was -99.02%, which is greater than NVS's maximum drawdown of -30.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIPLA.NS and NVS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIPLA.NSNVSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.02%

-30.13%

-68.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.32%

-9.01%

-19.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.32%

-18.63%

-9.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.32%

-18.63%

-9.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.40%

-21.18%

-22.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.34%

-8.25%

-9.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.85%

-7.24%

-45.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.74%

3.67%

+10.07%

Volatility

CIPLA.NS vs. NVS - Volatility Comparison

Cipla Limited (CIPLA.NS) has a higher volatility of 9.87% compared to Novartis AG (NVS) at 5.86%. This indicates that CIPLA.NS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIPLA.NSNVSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.87%

5.86%

+4.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.20%

13.93%

+2.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.79%

20.24%

+0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.04%

18.42%

+4.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.79%

19.16%

+6.63%

Dividends

CIPLA.NS vs. NVS - Dividend Comparison

CIPLA.NS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than NVS's 3.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIPLA.NS
Cipla Limited
1.16%1.06%0.85%0.68%0.46%0.53%0.49%0.63%0.58%0.33%0.35%0.31%
NVS
Novartis AG
3.32%2.90%3.84%3.44%3.70%3.86%3.22%3.03%3.47%3.24%3.73%3.10%

Financials

CIPLA.NS vs. NVS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cipla Limited and Novartis AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. CIPLA.NS values in INR, NVS values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


CIPLA.NS and NVS have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIPLA.NS and NVS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer