PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIPLA.NS vs. MARICO.NS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CIPLA.NS vs. MARICO.NS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a ₹10,000 investment in Cipla Limited (CIPLA.NS) and Marico Limited (MARICO.NS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIPLA.NS achieves a -9.01% return, which is significantly lower than MARICO.NS's 8.08% return. Over the past 10 years, CIPLA.NS has underperformed MARICO.NS with an annualized return of 12.18%, while MARICO.NS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.91% annualized return.


CIPLA.NS

1D
-0.30%
1M
3.01%
YTD
-9.01%
6M
-8.81%
1Y
-5.66%
3Y*
13.52%
5Y*
8.57%
10Y*
12.18%

MARICO.NS

1D
0.04%
1M
3.40%
YTD
8.08%
6M
14.16%
1Y
16.45%
3Y*
15.15%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*
13.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIPLA.NS vs. MARICO.NS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CIPLA.NS
Cipla Limited
-9.01%-0.10%23.72%16.77%14.52%15.78%73.26%-7.42%-14.21%7.36%
MARICO.NS
Marico Limited
8.08%19.17%18.07%9.17%0.71%29.46%20.43%-7.13%17.41%25.44%

Correlation

The correlation between CIPLA.NS and MARICO.NS is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 1996

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIPLA.NS vs. MARICO.NS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIPLA.NS
CIPLA.NS Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
CIPLA.NS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIPLA.NS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIPLA.NS Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
CIPLA.NS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIPLA.NS Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

MARICO.NS
MARICO.NS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MARICO.NS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MARICO.NS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
MARICO.NS Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
MARICO.NS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
MARICO.NS Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIPLA.NS vs. MARICO.NS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cipla Limited (CIPLA.NS) and Marico Limited (MARICO.NS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIPLA.NSMARICO.NSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.17

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.20

1.57

-1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.41

4.02

-4.43

CIPLA.NS vs. MARICO.NS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIPLA.NS Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the MARICO.NS Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIPLA.NS and MARICO.NS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CIPLA.NSMARICO.NSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

0.94

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.55

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.60

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.79

-0.75

Drawdowns

CIPLA.NS vs. MARICO.NS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIPLA.NS drawdown since its inception was -99.02%, which is greater than MARICO.NS's maximum drawdown of -67.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIPLA.NS and MARICO.NS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIPLA.NSMARICO.NSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.02%

-67.23%

-31.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.32%

-10.50%

-17.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.32%

-16.66%

-11.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.32%

-20.30%

-8.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.40%

-38.14%

-5.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.34%

-3.71%

-13.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.85%

-13.23%

-39.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.74%

4.09%

+9.65%

Volatility

CIPLA.NS vs. MARICO.NS - Volatility Comparison

Cipla Limited (CIPLA.NS) has a higher volatility of 9.87% compared to Marico Limited (MARICO.NS) at 4.63%. This indicates that CIPLA.NS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MARICO.NS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIPLA.NSMARICO.NSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.87%

4.63%

+5.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.20%

13.39%

+2.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.79%

17.49%

+3.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.04%

22.39%

+0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.79%

23.58%

+2.21%

Dividends

CIPLA.NS vs. MARICO.NS - Dividend Comparison

CIPLA.NS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than MARICO.NS's 0.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIPLA.NS
Cipla Limited
1.16%1.06%0.85%0.68%0.46%0.53%0.49%0.63%0.58%0.33%0.35%0.31%
MARICO.NS
Marico Limited
0.86%1.40%1.02%1.37%1.23%1.46%1.74%1.61%1.21%1.16%1.54%0.72%

Financials

CIPLA.NS vs. MARICO.NS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cipla Limited and Marico Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in INR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CIPLA.NS and MARICO.NS have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIPLA.NS and MARICO.NS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer