CINF vs. SWK
CINF (Cincinnati Financial Corporation) and SWK (Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.) are both stocks. CINF operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services), while SWK operates in Tools & Accessories (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CINF returned 11.95%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for SWK. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CINF vs. SWK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CINF achieves a 10.03% return, which is significantly lower than SWK's 30.12% return. Over the past 10 years, CINF has outperformed SWK with an annualized return of 11.95%, while SWK has yielded a comparatively lower 0.18% annualized return.
CINF
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- -5.09%
- 6M
- 11.70%
- YTD
- 10.03%
- 1Y
- 23.15%
- 3Y*
- 20.85%
- 5Y*
- 11.28%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.07%
SWK
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 3.55%
- 6M
- 22.87%
- YTD
- 30.12%
- 1Y
- 46.18%
- 3Y*
- 0.86%
- 5Y*
- -10.50%
- 10Y*
- 0.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $158.60M | $174.30M | $143.71M | |
| $217.53M | $159.95M | $146.32M |
CINF vs. SWK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation | 10.03% | 16.27% | 42.48% | 4.00% | -7.89% | 33.28% | -14.15% | 38.87% | 6.25% | 2.34% |
SWK Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | 30.12% | -3.17% | -15.19% | 35.55% | -58.92% | 7.28% | 9.73% | 41.18% | -28.13% | 50.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between CINF and SWK is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.38 |
The correlation between CINF and SWK shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.41 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CINF:
$27.27B
SWK:
$14.28B
CINF:
$28.19
SWK:
$5.44
CINF:
6.30
SWK:
17.39
CINF:
1.50
SWK:
0.71
CINF:
$13.95B
SWK:
$15.25B
CINF:
$4.91B
SWK:
$4.84B
CINF:
$2.73B
SWK:
$1.33B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CINF vs. SWK — Risk / Return Rank
CINF
SWK
CINF vs. SWK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CINF | SWK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.22 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 1.78 | +0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.31 | 3.95 | +1.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CINF vs. SWK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CINF drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, smaller than the maximum SWK drawdown of -71.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CINF and SWK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CINF | SWK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.64% | -71.31% | +11.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.46% | -26.14% | +15.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.03% | -48.31% | +28.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.77% | -68.79% | +33.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.12% | -71.31% | +13.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.47% | -48.55% | +41.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.16% | -19.56% | +7.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.37% | 11.73% | -7.36% |
Volatility
CINF vs. SWK - Volatility Comparison
Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) have volatilities of 10.14% and 10.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CINF | SWK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.14% | 10.42% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.07% | 28.86% | -11.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.21% | 38.42% | -17.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.76% | 38.16% | -12.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.97% | 36.85% | -7.88% |
Dividends
CINF vs. SWK - Dividend Comparison
CINF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than SWK's 3.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation | 2.04% | 2.13% | 2.25% | 2.90% | 2.70% | 2.21% | 2.75% | 2.13% | 2.74% | 3.33% | 2.53% | 3.89% |
SWK Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | 3.51% | 4.44% | 4.06% | 3.28% | 4.23% | 1.58% | 1.56% | 1.63% | 2.15% | 1.43% | 1.97% | 2.01% |
Financials
CINF vs. SWK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cincinnati Financial Corporation and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CINF vs. SWK - Profitability Comparison
CINF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SWK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.31B and revenue of 3.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.0%.
CINF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 4.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
SWK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. reported an operating income of 361.70M and revenue of 3.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.
CINF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported a net income of 1.26B and revenue of 4.27B, resulting in a net margin of 29.4%.
SWK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. reported a net income of 351.30M and revenue of 3.96B, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CINF and SWK have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SWK has higher volatility (10.42%) compared to CINF (10.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CINF dropped -59.64% vs SWK's -71.31%.
SWK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CINF and SWK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer