CINF vs. MMM

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

CINF (Cincinnati Financial Corporation) and MMM (3M Company) are both stocks. CINF operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services), while MMM operates in Conglomerates (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CINF returned 11.63%/yr vs 4.22%/yr for MMM. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CINF vs. MMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) and 3M Company (MMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CINF achieves a -0.07% return, which is significantly higher than MMM's -2.97% return. Over the past 10 years, CINF has outperformed MMM with an annualized return of 11.63%, while MMM has yielded a comparatively lower 4.22% annualized return.

CINF

• 1D: -1.84%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: -0.07%
• 6M: 1.71%
• 1Y: 9.89%
• 3Y*: 19.76%
• 5Y*: 8.67%
• 10Y*: 11.63%

MMM

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 7.92%
• YTD: -2.97%
• 6M: -5.26%
• 1Y: 7.72%
• 3Y*: 26.44%
• 5Y*: 1.64%
• 10Y*: 4.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CINF vs. MMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation	-0.07%	16.27%	42.48%	4.00%	-7.89%	33.28%	-14.15%	38.87%	6.25%	2.34%
MMM 3M Company	-2.97%	26.36%	46.13%	-3.33%	-29.63%	4.85%	2.77%	-4.29%	-16.90%	34.90%

Correlation

The correlation between CINF and MMM is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 1990	0.40

The correlation between CINF and MMM shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.44 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS CINF : $23.30 MMM : $5.17
PE Ratio CINF : 6.96 MMM : 29.78
PS Ratio CINF : 1.49 MMM : 3.32
Total Revenue (TTM) CINF : $12.92B MMM : $25.02B
Gross Profit (TTM) CINF : $5.39B MMM : $9.89B
EBITDA (TTM) CINF : $3.27B MMM : $5.28B

Return for Risk

CINF vs. MMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CINF

CINF Risk / Return Rank: 57
CINF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
CINF Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
CINF Omega Ratio Rank: 49
CINF Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
CINF Martin Ratio Rank: 65

MMM

MMM Risk / Return Rank: 50
MMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
MMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
MMM Omega Ratio Rank: 45
MMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
MMM Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CINF vs. MMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) and 3M Company (MMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CINF	MMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.50	0.30	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.83	0.61	+0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.07	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.95	0.41	+0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.47	0.92	+1.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CINF vs. MMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CINF Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is higher than the MMM Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CINF and MMM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CINF	MMM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50	0.30	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	0.06	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	0.16	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.34	+0.08

Drawdowns

CINF vs. MMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CINF drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, roughly equal to the maximum MMM drawdown of -59.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CINF and MMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CINF	MMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.64%	-59.10%	-0.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.46%	-18.77%	+8.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.03%	-22.87%	+2.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.77%	-53.41%	+17.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.12%	-59.10%	+0.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.47%	-11.04%	+5.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.19%	-16.11%	+3.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.07%	8.41%	-4.34%

Volatility

CINF vs. MMM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) is 5.78%, while 3M Company (MMM) has a volatility of 6.60%. This indicates that CINF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CINF	MMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.78%	6.60%	-0.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.67%	19.32%	-5.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.78%	26.01%	-6.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.69%	28.30%	-2.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.82%	26.54%	+2.28%

Dividends

CINF vs. MMM - Dividend Comparison

CINF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than MMM's 1.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation	2.19%	2.13%	2.25%	2.90%	2.70%	2.21%	2.75%	2.13%	2.74%	3.33%	2.53%	3.89%
MMM 3M Company	1.96%	1.82%	16.27%	5.49%	4.97%	3.33%	3.36%	3.26%	2.86%	2.00%	2.49%	2.72%

Financials

CINF vs. MMM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cincinnati Financial Corporation and 3M Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CINF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MMM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, 3M Company reported a gross profit of 2.46B and revenue of 6.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.7%.

CINF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 2.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

MMM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, 3M Company reported an operating income of 1.40B and revenue of 6.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.2%.

CINF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported a net income of 274.00M and revenue of 2.86B, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.

MMM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, 3M Company reported a net income of 653.00M and revenue of 6.03B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CINF and MMM in my portfolio?

CINF and MMM have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CINF or MMM?

MMM has higher volatility (6.60%) compared to CINF (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CINF dropped -59.64% vs MMM's -59.10%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CINF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.