CINF vs. LEG
CINF (Cincinnati Financial Corporation) and LEG (Leggett & Platt, Incorporated) are both stocks. CINF operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services), while LEG operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, CINF returned 12.21%/yr vs -11.06%/yr for LEG. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CINF vs. LEG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CINF achieves a 4.09% return, which is significantly higher than LEG's -3.16% return. Over the past 10 years, CINF has outperformed LEG with an annualized return of 12.21%, while LEG has yielded a comparatively lower -11.06% annualized return.
CINF
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- YTD
- 4.09%
- 6M
- 3.04%
- 1Y
- 16.62%
- 3Y*
- 21.01%
- 5Y*
- 9.44%
- 10Y*
- 12.21%
LEG
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 12.65%
- YTD
- -3.16%
- 6M
- -7.69%
- 1Y
- 12.37%
- 3Y*
- -27.77%
- 5Y*
- -24.81%
- 10Y*
- -11.06%
CINF vs. LEG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation | 4.09% | 16.27% | 42.48% | 4.00% | -7.89% | 33.28% | -14.15% | 38.87% | 6.25% | 2.34% |
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | -3.16% | 17.02% | -61.93% | -13.45% | -17.78% | -3.76% | -9.05% | 47.13% | -22.25% | 0.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between CINF and LEG is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.38 |
The correlation between CINF and LEG shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.41 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CINF:
$23.30
LEG:
$1.60
CINF:
7.25
LEG:
6.62
CINF:
1.55
LEG:
0.49
CINF:
$12.92B
LEG:
$3.03B
CINF:
$5.39B
LEG:
$717.40M
CINF:
$3.27B
LEG:
$433.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CINF vs. LEG — Risk / Return Rank
CINF
LEG
CINF vs. LEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CINF | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.09 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 0.44 | +1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.14 | 0.90 | +3.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CINF vs. LEG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CINF drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, smaller than the maximum LEG drawdown of -86.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CINF and LEG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CINF | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.64% | -86.41% | +26.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.46% | -28.51% | +18.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.03% | -77.39% | +57.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.77% | -85.05% | +49.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.12% | -86.41% | +28.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.53% | -77.60% | +76.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.19% | -19.65% | +7.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.03% | 13.77% | -9.74% |
Volatility
CINF vs. LEG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) is 6.02%, while Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) has a volatility of 11.98%. This indicates that CINF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CINF | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.02% | 11.98% | -5.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.80% | 31.40% | -17.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.75% | 49.76% | -30.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.69% | 42.50% | -16.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.81% | 39.81% | -11.00% |
Dividends
CINF vs. LEG - Dividend Comparison
CINF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than LEG's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation | 2.10% | 2.13% | 2.25% | 2.90% | 2.70% | 2.21% | 2.75% | 2.13% | 2.74% | 3.33% | 2.53% | 3.89% |
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | 1.89% | 1.82% | 6.35% | 6.95% | 5.40% | 4.03% | 3.61% | 3.11% | 4.19% | 2.98% | 2.74% | 3.00% |
Financials
CINF vs. LEG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cincinnati Financial Corporation and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CINF and LEG have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LEG has higher volatility (11.98%) compared to CINF (6.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CINF dropped -59.64% vs LEG's -86.41%.
CINF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CINF and LEG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer