CINF vs. CGDV
CINF (Cincinnati Financial Corporation) is a stock, while CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) is Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. Over the past 3 years, CINF returned 19.23%/yr vs 25.14%/yr for CGDV. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CINF vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CINF achieves a -2.68% return, which is significantly lower than CGDV's 11.89% return.
CINF
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -0.97%
- YTD
- -2.68%
- 6M
- -1.87%
- 1Y
- 6.69%
- 3Y*
- 19.23%
- 5Y*
- 7.56%
- 10Y*
- 11.49%
CGDV
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 5.09%
- YTD
- 11.89%
- 6M
- 12.43%
- 1Y
- 30.91%
- 3Y*
- 25.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CINF vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation | -2.68% | 16.27% | 42.48% | 4.00% | -12.12% |
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 11.89% | 25.50% | 20.10% | 28.81% | -2.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between CINF and CGDV is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022 | 0.50 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CINF and CGDV has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CINF vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank
CINF
CGDV
CINF vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CINF | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.50 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 3.18 | -2.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.66 | 15.06 | -13.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CINF | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 | 2.68 | -2.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 1.24 | -0.82 |
Drawdowns
CINF vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CINF drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CINF and CGDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CINF | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.64% | -21.82% | -37.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.46% | -9.75% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.03% | -14.28% | -5.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.94% | -0.55% | -7.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.20% | -3.62% | -8.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.05% | 2.06% | +1.99% |
Volatility
CINF vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison
Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) has a higher volatility of 4.44% compared to Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) at 3.09%. This indicates that CINF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CINF | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.44% | 3.09% | +1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.21% | 9.13% | +4.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.42% | 11.59% | +7.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.65% | 15.48% | +10.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.79% | 15.48% | +13.31% |
Dividends
CINF vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison
CINF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than CGDV's 1.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 1.17% | 1.29% | 1.60% | 1.65% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation | 2.25% | 2.13% | 2.25% | 2.90% | 2.70% | 2.21% | 2.75% | 2.13% | 2.74% | 3.33% | 2.53% | 3.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CINF and CGDV have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CINF has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to CGDV (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CINF dropped -59.64% vs CGDV's -21.82%.
CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CINF and CGDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer