CIMDX vs. NAMAX
CIMDX (Clarkston Founders Fund) and NAMAX (Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, CIMDX returned 0.78%/yr vs 11.45%/yr for NAMAX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CIMDX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for NAMAX.
Performance
CIMDX vs. NAMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIMDX achieves a -7.17% return, which is significantly lower than NAMAX's 21.10% return.
CIMDX
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- YTD
- -7.17%
- 6M
- -8.00%
- 1Y
- -0.47%
- 3Y*
- 4.28%
- 5Y*
- 0.78%
- 10Y*
- —
NAMAX
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- 3.95%
- YTD
- 21.10%
- 6M
- 19.79%
- 1Y
- 34.84%
- 3Y*
- 19.43%
- 5Y*
- 11.45%
- 10Y*
- 11.65%
CIMDX vs. NAMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIMDX Clarkston Founders Fund | -7.17% | 7.35% | 5.67% | 10.38% | -3.67% | 6.23% | 23.21% | 23.74% | -7.85% | 11.25% |
NAMAX Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund | 21.10% | 13.77% | 13.14% | 9.65% | -9.33% | 32.28% | 6.90% | 31.56% | -18.46% | 12.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIMDX and NAMAX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.81 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CIMDX and NAMAX has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIMDX vs. NAMAX — Risk / Return Rank
CIMDX
NAMAX
CIMDX vs. NAMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX) and Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund (NAMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CIMDX | NAMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.43 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 4.26 | -4.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.04 | 16.62 | -16.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIMDX vs. NAMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIMDX drawdown since its inception was -31.86%, smaller than the maximum NAMAX drawdown of -60.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIMDX and NAMAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIMDX | NAMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.86% | -60.44% | +28.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.83% | -8.49% | -3.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.82% | -20.90% | +6.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.98% | -20.90% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.67% | -1.14% | -9.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.92% | -8.49% | +2.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.98% | 2.17% | +2.81% |
Volatility
CIMDX vs. NAMAX - Volatility Comparison
Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund (NAMAX) at 4.79%. This indicates that CIMDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NAMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIMDX | NAMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.35% | 4.79% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.55% | 10.92% | +1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.40% | 14.34% | +2.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.06% | 18.12% | -2.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 20.04% | -2.52% |
CIMDX vs. NAMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIMDX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NAMAX's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIMDX vs. NAMAX - Dividend Comparison
CIMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than NAMAX's 6.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIMDX Clarkston Founders Fund | 3.49% | 3.24% | 0.45% | 1.62% | 6.38% | 0.44% | 0.91% | 3.32% | 2.27% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NAMAX Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund | 6.15% | 6.71% | 7.07% | 0.74% | 6.39% | 8.99% | 3.22% | 3.38% | 27.38% | 21.08% | 8.07% | 17.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIMDX and NAMAX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIMDX has higher volatility (5.35%) compared to NAMAX (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIMDX dropped -31.86% vs NAMAX's -60.44%.
NAMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CIMDX and NAMAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer