CIMDX vs. HAMVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX) and Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX).
CIMDX is managed by Clarkston Funds. It was launched on Jan 31, 2017. HAMVX is managed by Harbor. It was launched on Mar 1, 2002.
Performance
CIMDX vs. HAMVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CIMDX vs. HAMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIMDX Clarkston Founders Fund | -6.99% | 7.35% | 5.67% | 10.38% | -3.67% | 6.23% | 23.21% | 23.74% | -7.85% | 11.25% |
HAMVX Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund | 2.65% | 16.00% | 12.10% | 16.42% | -5.63% | 29.93% | -3.77% | 22.93% | -17.82% | 11.04% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIMDX achieves a -6.99% return, which is significantly lower than HAMVX's 2.65% return.
CIMDX
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- -8.15%
- YTD
- -6.99%
- 6M
- -4.06%
- 1Y
- 0.79%
- 3Y*
- 4.20%
- 5Y*
- 1.54%
- 10Y*
- —
HAMVX
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- 2.65%
- 6M
- 6.88%
- 1Y
- 22.26%
- 3Y*
- 15.51%
- 5Y*
- 9.83%
- 10Y*
- 9.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CIMDX vs. HAMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIMDX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than HAMVX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CIMDX vs. HAMVX — Risk / Return Rank
CIMDX
HAMVX
CIMDX vs. HAMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX) and Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIMDX | HAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.07 | 1.22 | -1.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.24 | 1.80 | -1.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.25 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.00 | 1.53 | -1.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.01 | 6.94 | -6.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIMDX | HAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 | 1.22 | -1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.52 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.37 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between CIMDX and HAMVX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CIMDX vs. HAMVX - Dividend Comparison
CIMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than HAMVX's 8.45% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIMDX Clarkston Founders Fund | 3.49% | 3.24% | 0.45% | 1.62% | 6.38% | 0.44% | 0.91% | 3.32% | 2.27% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HAMVX Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund | 8.45% | 8.67% | 5.77% | 7.20% | 8.24% | 1.27% | 2.35% | 3.10% | 8.41% | 3.84% | 3.06% | 3.30% |
Drawdowns
CIMDX vs. HAMVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIMDX drawdown since its inception was -31.86%, smaller than the maximum HAMVX drawdown of -64.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIMDX and HAMVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIMDX | HAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.86% | -64.17% | +32.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.30% | -13.67% | +2.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.26% | -21.04% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.49% | -6.31% | -4.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.88% | -10.05% | +4.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 3.02% | +0.55% |
Volatility
CIMDX vs. HAMVX - Volatility Comparison
Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX) at 4.05%. This indicates that CIMDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CIMDX | HAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.56% | 4.05% | +0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.25% | 9.89% | +1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.62% | 19.00% | -0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 18.92% | -3.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 21.89% | -4.39% |