PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIMDX vs. ACLAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIMDX vs. ACLAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX) and American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class (ACLAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIMDX achieves a 3.55% return, which is significantly lower than ACLAX's 15.09% return.


CIMDX

1D
-0.98%
1M
0.06%
6M
2.26%
YTD
3.55%
1Y
11.94%
3Y*
6.46%
5Y*
3.97%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.99%

ACLAX

1D
-0.24%
1M
2.00%
6M
10.08%
YTD
15.09%
1Y
20.66%
3Y*
11.01%
5Y*
8.29%
10Y*
9.17%
ALL TIME*
9.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CIMDX vs. ACLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CIMDX
Clarkston Founders Fund
3.55%7.35%5.67%10.38%-3.67%6.23%23.21%23.74%-7.85%11.25%
ACLAX
American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class
15.09%8.52%8.18%5.93%-1.53%23.01%1.44%28.55%-12.93%9.91%

Correlation

The correlation between CIMDX and ACLAX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.84

The correlation between CIMDX and ACLAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIMDX vs. ACLAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CIMDX
CIMDX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
CIMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
CIMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

ACLAX
ACLAX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ACLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
ACLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CIMDX vs. ACLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX) and American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class (ACLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIMDXACLAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.30

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

2.33

-1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.95

7.59

-5.64

CIMDX vs. ACLAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIMDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the ACLAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIMDX and ACLAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CIMDX vs. ACLAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIMDX drawdown since its inception was -31.86%, smaller than the maximum ACLAX drawdown of -51.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIMDX and ACLAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIMDXACLAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.86%

-51.37%

+19.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.83%

-8.50%

-3.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.82%

-14.67%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.58%

-17.55%

+1.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.61%

-1.41%

-3.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.89%

-6.22%

+0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.97%

2.61%

+2.36%

Volatility

CIMDX vs. ACLAX - Volatility Comparison

Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX) has a higher volatility of 9.88% compared to American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class (ACLAX) at 3.42%. This indicates that CIMDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACLAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIMDXACLAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.88%

3.42%

+6.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.91%

8.60%

+7.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.84%

11.79%

+7.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.65%

14.58%

+2.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.75%

17.41%

+0.34%

CIMDX vs. ACLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIMDX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than ACLAX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

CIMDX vs. ACLAX - Dividend Comparison

CIMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, less than ACLAX's 12.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACLAX
American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class
12.54%14.24%8.53%5.01%14.77%15.72%1.62%1.23%14.17%9.25%3.82%10.86%
CIMDX
Clarkston Founders Fund
3.13%3.24%0.45%1.62%6.38%0.44%0.91%3.32%2.27%0.41%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CIMDX and ACLAX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIMDX has higher volatility (9.88%) compared to ACLAX (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIMDX dropped -31.86% vs ACLAX's -51.37%.

ACLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIMDX and ACLAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer