PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIM vs. ACRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CIM vs. ACRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) and Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (ACRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIM achieves a 10.78% return, which is significantly higher than ACRE's -0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, CIM has underperformed ACRE with an annualized return of -1.39%, while ACRE has yielded a comparatively higher 1.22% annualized return.


CIM

1D
0.08%
1M
0.23%
YTD
10.78%
6M
9.84%
1Y
9.45%
3Y*
3.87%
5Y*
-11.82%
10Y*
-1.39%

ACRE

1D
0.22%
1M
-3.75%
YTD
-0.26%
6M
-7.58%
1Y
8.41%
3Y*
-11.85%
5Y*
-9.67%
10Y*
1.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIM vs. ACRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CIM
Chimera Investment Corporation
10.78%-0.65%3.61%2.95%-57.95%60.73%-42.97%27.65%7.71%17.30%
ACRE
Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation
-0.26%-7.92%-34.00%15.56%-20.44%34.30%-13.84%32.33%10.33%1.93%

Correlation

The correlation between CIM and ACRE is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2012

0.56

The correlation between CIM and ACRE shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CIM:

$1.11B

ACRE:

$255.59M

EPS

CIM:

$0.23

ACRE:

-$0.36

PS Ratio

CIM:

2.20

ACRE:

4.66

PB Ratio

CIM:

0.45

ACRE:

0.52

Total Revenue (TTM)

CIM:

$499.18M

ACRE:

$54.71M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CIM:

$465.68M

ACRE:

$25.31M

EBITDA (TTM)

CIM:

$439.34M

ACRE:

$30.62M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIM vs. ACRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIM
CIM Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
CIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIM Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
CIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIM Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

ACRE
ACRE Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
ACRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACRE Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
ACRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACRE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIM vs. ACRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) and Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (ACRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIMACREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.07

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

0.48

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.27

0.97

+0.30

CIM vs. ACRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIM Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is higher than the ACRE Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIM and ACRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CIM vs. ACRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIM drawdown since its inception was -89.69%, which is greater than ACRE's maximum drawdown of -75.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIM and ACRE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIMACREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.69%

-75.68%

-14.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.18%

-17.69%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.80%

-61.28%

+25.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.09%

-67.51%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.35%

-75.68%

+3.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.51%

-51.39%

-8.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.75%

-19.90%

-31.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.48%

8.71%

-1.23%

Volatility

CIM vs. ACRE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) is 5.94%, while Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (ACRE) has a volatility of 10.73%. This indicates that CIM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIMACREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.94%

10.73%

-4.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.77%

24.56%

-6.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.07%

37.57%

-12.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.22%

35.45%

-0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.49%

45.08%

-8.59%

Dividends

CIM vs. ACRE - Dividend Comparison

CIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.75%, less than ACRE's 12.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACRE
Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation
12.99%12.55%16.98%13.13%13.61%9.63%11.08%8.33%8.90%8.37%7.57%8.74%
CIM
Chimera Investment Corporation
11.75%11.91%10.14%14.03%20.36%8.55%13.66%9.73%11.22%8.12%14.34%28.15%

Financials

CIM vs. ACRE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chimera Investment Corporation and Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-200.00M-100.00M0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M202220232024202520260
13.46M
(CIM) Total Revenue
(ACRE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CIM and ACRE have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACRE has higher volatility (10.73%) compared to CIM (5.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIM dropped -89.69% vs ACRE's -75.68%.

CIM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIM and ACRE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer