PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CII vs. OMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CII vs. OMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund (CII) and OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CII achieves a 12.40% return, which is significantly higher than OMF's -16.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CII having a 15.39% annualized return and OMF not far behind at 15.19%.


CII

1D
-0.78%
1M
5.40%
YTD
12.40%
6M
12.39%
1Y
47.06%
3Y*
24.31%
5Y*
14.98%
10Y*
15.39%

OMF

1D
-0.44%
1M
-1.82%
YTD
-16.20%
6M
-10.22%
1Y
13.87%
3Y*
19.47%
5Y*
8.00%
10Y*
15.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CII vs. OMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CII
BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund
12.40%37.78%12.70%18.47%-13.21%34.26%8.11%30.46%-8.60%27.73%
OMF
OneMain Holdings, Inc.
-16.20%39.77%15.14%63.03%-27.20%23.56%34.53%88.37%-6.54%17.39%

Correlation

The correlation between CII and OMF is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2015

0.49

The correlation between CII and OMF shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CII vs. OMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CII
CII Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CII Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
CII Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CII Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
CII Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

OMF
OMF Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
OMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
OMF Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
OMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
OMF Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CII vs. OMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund (CII) and OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIIOMFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.15

0.49

+2.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.12

0.85

+3.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.10

+0.43

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.03

0.45

+3.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.55

1.03

+15.51

CII vs. OMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CII Sharpe Ratio is 3.15, which is higher than the OMF Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CII and OMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CIIOMFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.15

0.49

+2.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.23

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.33

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.19

+0.34

Drawdowns

CII vs. OMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CII drawdown since its inception was -56.43%, smaller than the maximum OMF drawdown of -68.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CII and OMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIIOMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.43%

-68.66%

+12.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.67%

-29.68%

+18.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.05%

-29.94%

+8.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.32%

-47.93%

+25.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

-68.66%

+28.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.26%

-20.69%

+18.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.18%

-24.31%

+18.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

12.78%

-9.94%

Volatility

CII vs. OMF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund (CII) is 4.44%, while OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) has a volatility of 7.03%. This indicates that CII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIIOMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

7.03%

-2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.90%

21.03%

-9.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.01%

28.41%

-13.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.11%

35.52%

-18.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.52%

46.08%

-27.56%

Dividends

CII vs. OMF - Dividend Comparison

CII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.27%, more than OMF's 7.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CII
BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund
15.27%16.65%6.15%6.28%12.27%4.98%6.03%5.79%7.06%6.07%8.38%8.49%
OMF
OneMain Holdings, Inc.
7.69%6.17%7.90%8.13%11.41%19.08%12.33%7.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CII and OMF have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OMF has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to CII (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CII dropped -56.43% vs OMF's -68.66%.

CII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CII and OMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer