PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIGEX vs. CXGCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIGEX vs. CXGCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Global Equity Fund (CIGEX) and Calamos Global Convertible Fund (CXGCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIGEX achieves a 12.90% return, which is significantly lower than CXGCX's 14.32% return. Over the past 10 years, CIGEX has outperformed CXGCX with an annualized return of 14.37%, while CXGCX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.01% annualized return.


CIGEX

1D
0.69%
1M
-2.96%
6M
7.07%
YTD
12.90%
1Y
19.98%
3Y*
22.26%
5Y*
10.50%
10Y*
14.37%
ALL TIME*
10.16%

CXGCX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.06%
6M
11.17%
YTD
14.32%
1Y
23.49%
3Y*
15.12%
5Y*
5.34%
10Y*
9.01%
ALL TIME*
7.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CIGEX vs. CXGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CIGEX
Calamos Global Equity Fund
12.90%18.46%30.61%24.55%-27.42%16.61%44.24%29.43%-15.54%34.56%
CXGCX
Calamos Global Convertible Fund
14.32%18.49%10.98%13.48%-22.06%-0.31%38.60%15.18%-2.76%14.25%

Correlation

The correlation between CIGEX and CXGCX is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.84

The correlation between CIGEX and CXGCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIGEX vs. CXGCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CIGEX
CIGEX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CIGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
CIGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

CXGCX
CXGCX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
CXGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
CXGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CIGEX vs. CXGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Global Equity Fund (CIGEX) and Calamos Global Convertible Fund (CXGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIGEXCXGCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.36

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

3.98

-2.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.29

11.33

-7.04

CIGEX vs. CXGCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIGEX Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the CXGCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIGEX and CXGCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CIGEX vs. CXGCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIGEX drawdown since its inception was -60.48%, which is greater than CXGCX's maximum drawdown of -30.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIGEX and CXGCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIGEXCXGCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.48%

-30.74%

-29.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.31%

-5.75%

-7.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.41%

-8.92%

-11.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.81%

-28.88%

-6.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.81%

-30.74%

-5.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.98%

-2.65%

-5.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.29%

-7.19%

-3.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.15%

2.01%

+2.14%

Volatility

CIGEX vs. CXGCX - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Global Equity Fund (CIGEX) has a higher volatility of 6.39% compared to Calamos Global Convertible Fund (CXGCX) at 2.89%. This indicates that CIGEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CXGCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIGEXCXGCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.39%

2.89%

+3.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.30%

8.62%

+9.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.59%

10.97%

+10.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.89%

9.82%

+10.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.60%

9.58%

+10.02%

CIGEX vs. CXGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIGEX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CXGCX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

CIGEX vs. CXGCX - Dividend Comparison

CIGEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.61%, more than CXGCX's 4.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIGEX
Calamos Global Equity Fund
13.61%15.37%8.67%0.10%4.43%11.75%6.51%7.44%27.66%9.21%4.62%1.98%
CXGCX
Calamos Global Convertible Fund
4.68%5.15%0.00%0.39%0.00%14.77%8.19%2.36%5.75%3.73%2.22%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


CIGEX and CXGCX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIGEX has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to CXGCX (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIGEX dropped -60.48% vs CXGCX's -30.74%.

CXGCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIGEX and CXGCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer