CIGEX vs. CSQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Calamos Global Equity Fund (CIGEX) and Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ).
CIGEX is managed by Calamos. It was launched on Feb 28, 2007. CSQ is an actively managed fund by Calamos. It was launched on Mar 26, 2004.
Performance
CIGEX vs. CSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CIGEX vs. CSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIGEX Calamos Global Equity Fund | -5.78% | 18.46% | 30.61% | 24.55% | -27.42% | 16.61% | 44.24% | 29.43% | -15.54% | 34.56% |
CSQ Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund | -9.64% | 16.25% | 28.11% | 20.80% | -24.26% | 30.77% | 26.22% | 38.62% | -4.89% | 27.98% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIGEX achieves a -5.78% return, which is significantly higher than CSQ's -9.64% return. Over the past 10 years, CIGEX has underperformed CSQ with an annualized return of 12.93%, while CSQ has yielded a comparatively higher 14.80% annualized return.
CIGEX
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -12.14%
- YTD
- -5.78%
- 6M
- -7.10%
- 1Y
- 19.44%
- 3Y*
- 18.74%
- 5Y*
- 8.14%
- 10Y*
- 12.93%
CSQ
- 1D
- 3.76%
- 1M
- -9.32%
- YTD
- -9.64%
- 6M
- -8.01%
- 1Y
- 13.61%
- 3Y*
- 15.37%
- 5Y*
- 7.59%
- 10Y*
- 14.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CIGEX vs. CSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIGEX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CSQ's 2.46% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CIGEX vs. CSQ — Risk / Return Rank
CIGEX
CSQ
CIGEX vs. CSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Global Equity Fund (CIGEX) and Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIGEX | CSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 0.65 | +0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.33 | 1.01 | +0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.16 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 0.83 | +0.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.84 | 3.29 | +1.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIGEX | CSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 0.65 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.38 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.65 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.39 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between CIGEX and CSQ is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CIGEX vs. CSQ - Dividend Comparison
CIGEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.31%, more than CSQ's 7.54% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIGEX Calamos Global Equity Fund | 16.31% | 15.37% | 8.67% | 0.10% | 4.43% | 11.75% | 6.51% | 7.44% | 27.66% | 9.21% | 4.62% | 1.98% |
CSQ Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund | 7.54% | 6.51% | 6.95% | 8.27% | 9.17% | 6.38% | 7.03% | 7.14% | 9.35% | 8.20% | 9.64% | 10.00% |
Drawdowns
CIGEX vs. CSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIGEX drawdown since its inception was -60.48%, smaller than the maximum CSQ drawdown of -67.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIGEX and CSQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIGEX | CSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.48% | -67.17% | +6.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.31% | -15.59% | +2.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.81% | -33.09% | -2.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.81% | -48.21% | +12.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.31% | -12.07% | -1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.42% | -9.40% | -1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 3.94% | -0.41% |
Volatility
CIGEX vs. CSQ - Volatility Comparison
Calamos Global Equity Fund (CIGEX) has a higher volatility of 8.43% compared to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ) at 6.85%. This indicates that CIGEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CIGEX | CSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.43% | 6.85% | +1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.83% | 11.54% | +3.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.26% | 21.12% | +0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 20.00% | -0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.25% | 22.93% | -3.68% |