CIFU vs. ORLG
CIFU (T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF) and ORLG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ORLY Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CIFU is actively managed, while ORLG is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. CIFU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ORLG.
Performance
CIFU vs. ORLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CIFU
- 1D
- -20.66%
- 1M
- -58.62%
- 6M
- -45.17%
- YTD
- -26.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ORLG
- 1D
- 8.37%
- 1M
- -11.93%
- 6M
- -23.86%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIFU vs. ORLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF | -48.19% |
ORLG Leverage Shares 2X Long ORLY Daily ETF | -25.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIFU and ORLG is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2026 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIFU vs. ORLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ORLY Daily ETF (ORLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIFU vs. ORLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIFU drawdown since its inception was -77.20%, which is greater than ORLG's maximum drawdown of -39.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFU and ORLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIFU | ORLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.20% | -39.93% | -37.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.94% | -34.91% | -31.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.91% | -20.65% | -22.26% |
Volatility
CIFU vs. ORLG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIFU | ORLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 206.70% | 59.08% | +147.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 206.70% | 59.08% | +147.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 206.70% | 59.08% | +147.62% |
CIFU vs. ORLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIFU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ORLG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIFU vs. ORLG - Dividend Comparison
Neither CIFU nor ORLG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CIFU and ORLG have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ORLG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ORLG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CIFU.
CIFU and ORLG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CIFU and 0.75% for ORLG.
Find the right allocation for CIFU and ORLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer