CIFU vs. MVLL
CIFU (T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF) and MVLL (GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CIFU is actively managed, while MVLL is passively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.50% expense ratio.
Performance
CIFU vs. MVLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIFU achieves a 94.41% return, which is significantly lower than MVLL's 610.13% return.
CIFU
- 1D
- -4.06%
- 1M
- 42.63%
- YTD
- 94.41%
- 6M
- 64.26%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MVLL
- 1D
- -18.97%
- 1M
- 63.90%
- YTD
- 610.13%
- 6M
- 563.50%
- 1Y
- 686.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIFU vs. MVLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF | 94.41% | -13.41% |
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF | 610.13% | 16.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIFU and MVLL is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIFU vs. MVLL — Risk / Return Rank
CIFU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MVLL
CIFU vs. MVLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CIFU | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.50 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 14.16 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 28.61 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIFU vs. MVLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIFU drawdown since its inception was -77.20%, which is greater than MVLL's maximum drawdown of -59.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFU and MVLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIFU | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.20% | -59.02% | -18.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -48.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.48% | -31.21% | +20.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.93% | -22.40% | -20.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 24.17% | — |
Volatility
CIFU vs. MVLL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIFU | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 87.05% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 113.21% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 207.07% | 145.20% | +61.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 207.07% | 147.26% | +59.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 207.07% | 147.26% | +59.81% |
CIFU vs. MVLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CIFU and MVLL have an expense ratio of 1.50%.
Dividends
CIFU vs. MVLL - Dividend Comparison
Neither CIFU nor MVLL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CIFU and MVLL have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIFU and MVLL have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.
CIFU and MVLL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: REX and GraniteShares.
Find the right allocation for CIFU and MVLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer