CIFU vs. GEVG
CIFU (T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF) and GEVG (Leverage Shares 2X Long GEV Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CIFU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GEVG.
Performance
CIFU vs. GEVG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CIFU having a 90.91% return and GEVG slightly lower at 88.18%.
CIFU
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 94.18%
- YTD
- 90.91%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GEVG
- 1D
- -2.09%
- 1M
- -22.22%
- YTD
- 88.18%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIFU vs. GEVG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF | 90.91% | -4.92% |
GEVG Leverage Shares 2X Long GEV Daily ETF | 88.18% | -11.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIFU and GEVG is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIFU vs. GEVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long GEV Daily ETF (GEVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIFU | GEVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 2.17 | -1.18 |
Drawdowns
CIFU vs. GEVG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIFU drawdown since its inception was -77.20%, which is greater than GEVG's maximum drawdown of -33.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFU and GEVG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIFU | GEVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.20% | -33.81% | -43.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.09% | -32.62% | +23.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.35% | -9.25% | -36.10% |
Volatility
CIFU vs. GEVG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIFU | GEVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 206.19% | 96.61% | +109.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 206.19% | 96.61% | +109.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 206.19% | 96.61% | +109.58% |
CIFU vs. GEVG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIFU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GEVG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIFU vs. GEVG - Dividend Comparison
Neither CIFU nor GEVG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CIFU and GEVG have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GEVG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GEVG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CIFU.
CIFU and GEVG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CIFU and 0.75% for GEVG.
Find the right allocation for CIFU and GEVG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer