CIFU vs. GEVG
CIFU (T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF) and GEVG (Leverage Shares 2X Long GEV Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CIFU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GEVG.
Performance
CIFU vs. GEVG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIFU achieves a 94.41% return, which is significantly lower than GEVG's 112.16% return.
CIFU
- 1D
- -4.06%
- 1M
- 42.63%
- YTD
- 94.41%
- 6M
- 64.26%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GEVG
- 1D
- -16.17%
- 1M
- -5.00%
- YTD
- 112.16%
- 6M
- 107.42%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIFU vs. GEVG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF | 94.41% | -2.83% |
GEVG Leverage Shares 2X Long GEV Daily ETF | 112.16% | -11.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIFU and GEVG is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIFU vs. GEVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long GEV Daily ETF (GEVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIFU vs. GEVG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIFU drawdown since its inception was -77.20%, which is greater than GEVG's maximum drawdown of -45.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFU and GEVG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIFU | GEVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.20% | -45.50% | -31.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.48% | -24.03% | +13.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.93% | -11.33% | -31.60% |
Volatility
CIFU vs. GEVG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIFU | GEVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 207.07% | 101.04% | +106.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 207.07% | 101.04% | +106.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 207.07% | 101.04% | +106.03% |
CIFU vs. GEVG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIFU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GEVG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIFU vs. GEVG - Dividend Comparison
Neither CIFU nor GEVG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CIFU and GEVG have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GEVG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GEVG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CIFU.
CIFU and GEVG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CIFU and 0.75% for GEVG.
Find the right allocation for CIFU and GEVG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer